|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王彦波,谢贤平,李锦峰,等.基于FAHP的煤矿瓦斯治理综合评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):101.
　WANG Yan bo,XIE Xian ping,LI Jin feng,et al.Study on comprehensive evaluation of coal mine gas control based on FAHP[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(11):101.
点击复制

基于FAHP的煤矿瓦斯治理综合评价研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
8
期数:
2012年11期
页码:
101
栏目:
出版日期:
2012-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on comprehensive evaluation of coal mine gas control based on FAHP
作者:
王彦波; 谢贤平; 李锦峰; 吴洋
(昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院,昆明〓650093)
Author(s):
WANG Yan bo;  XIE Xian ping;  LI Jin feng;  WU Yang
(The Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)
关键词:
层次分析法; 安全评价; 瓦斯治理; 模糊层次综合评价法 
Keywords:
〗 analytic hierarchy process (AHP);  safety assessment;  gas control;  fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在治理瓦斯的十六字体系的方针指导下，建立了包括通风可靠、抽采达标、监控有效、管理到位的4个单元、16项指标的多因素多级指标评价体系。运用层次分析法，分析在生产过程中影响瓦斯释放的各因素所占的权重系数，结果表明风流稳定是防治瓦斯的主要因素，执行有力、系统合理、多措并举、责任明确等因素要放在首要位置。在此基础上组织专家对评价指标打分及运用模糊层次综合评价法，来评价矿山治理瓦斯等级，得出结果为一般安全。从治理瓦斯的具体实施步骤再到整个矿井治理瓦斯的程度，从点到面系统地进行评价、验证。应用于矿山实际，具有一定的实用价值
Abstract:
Based on the guidance of gas control policy, A multi-factor and mult-level index evaluation system with 4 units and 16 indeses was established including ventilation reliable, extraction standard, monitor effective and administration in place. The AHP method was applied to analyze the weight coefficient accunted by each factor influencing gas release in production process, and the results showed that romantic stability is the main factor of the prevention and control of gas, the following factors such as powerful execution, system concerning the reasonable, simultaneously, responsibility clear should be placed in the foremost position. On this basis experts were organized to grade for evaluation index, and the fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the mine gas management level, the result of common security was obtained. From specific steps of gas control to the whole mine management of gas, from point to surface, the system evaluation and validation were conducted. It has certain practical value.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]汪送,王瑛,李超.BP神经网络在航空机务人员本质安全程度评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):35.
[2]施式亮,刘勇,李润求,等.基于AHPFuzzy的高处坠落危险性评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):132.
　SHI Shi liang,LIU Yong,LI Run qiu,et al.Research and application on risk assessment of high falling based on AHPFuzzy[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):132.
[3]金珠,马小平.基于核校准和SVM的煤矿安全组织管理因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):16.
　JIN Zhu,MA Xiao-ping.Analysis of organizational administrative factors in coal mine safety based on kernel alignment and SVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):16.
[4]王秀香,施红勋,牟善军,等.基于层次分析法的企业HSE管理绩效评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):98.
　WANG Xiu-xiang,SHI Hong-xun,MU Shan-jun,et al.Study on performance evaluation of enterprise HSE management based on AHP[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):98.
[5]陈杨,王为民,姜东方,等.基于故障树与灰色模糊理论的城市CNG加气站安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):123.
　Chen Yang,Wang Wei-min,JIANG Dong-fang,et al.Safety Assessment of the CNG station in city based on the Faulty Tree and Fuzzy-grey Theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):123.
[6]郭金玉,黄轶,廖海江,等.多层次模糊综合评估汽车制造企业职业危害风险[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):81.
　GUO Jin-yu,HUANG Yi,LIAO Hai-jiang,et al.Comprehensive evaluation on the occupational hazard risk in automobile industry based on multi-stage fuzzy-AHP comprehensive assessment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):81.
[7]吕显智,马建云,陶昆,等.基于模糊综合评价法的高层宾馆消防安全现状评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):138.
　LV Xian-zhi,MA Jian-yun,TAO Kun,et al.Establish?of fire safety evaluation system for high-rise hotel using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):138.
[8]郭凯旋.PTA生产火灾爆炸危险性分析与评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):167.
　GUO Kai-xuan.Analysis and Assessment on Fire & Explosion Risk for PTA Production[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):167.
[9]朱劭涌,曹雄,刘磊,等.糠醛厂生产过程安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):118.
　ZHU Shao-yong,CAO Xiong,LIU Lei,et al.Safety Assessment on productive process in one furfural factory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):118.
[10]何沙,吉安民,陈东升.模糊综合评价在钻井队安全管理评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):156.
　HE Sha,JI An-min,CHEN Dong-sheng.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in security management assessment Oil-drilling group[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):156.
[11]段礼祥,张来斌,钱永梅.AHP—模糊综合评价法在离心泵安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):127.
　DUAN Li xiang,ZHANG Lai bin,QIAN Yong mei.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in safety assessme of centrifuge pumpnt[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):127.
[12]冯睿智,张树海,苟瑞君,等.模糊综合评价在单基发射药生产安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):128.
　FENG Rui zhi,ZHANG Shu hai,GOU Rui jun,et al.Application of fuzzy comprehensive assessment in work safety evaluation of singlebase propellants[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(11):128.
[13]魏燕明,王明华,娄渊位,等.基于MDI综合赋权的军航空管模糊物元安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(6):147.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.026]
　WEI Yanming,WANG Minghua,LOU Yuanwei,et al.Fuzzy matter-element safety assessment for military ATC based on MDI comprehensive weighting[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(11):147.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.026]
[14]金洪伟,于世雷,徐刚,等.煤矿水害风险量化评价方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(4):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.04.017]
　JIN Hongwei,YU Shilei,XU Gang,et al.Quantitative evaluation method of water hazard risk in coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(11):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.04.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-11-30