|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吴衍翠,宋文华,谢飞,等.危险度评价法与蒙德法在焦化装置中的对比应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(12):112-117.
　WU Yan-cui,SONG Wen-hua,XIE Fei,et al.The contrast application research between risk factor appraisal law and mond process in coking unit[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):112-117.
点击复制

危险度评价法与蒙德法在焦化装置中的对比应用研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年12期
页码:
112-117
栏目:
出版日期:
2011-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The contrast application research between risk factor appraisal law and mond process in coking unit
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-12-0112-006
作者:
吴衍翠； 宋文华； 谢飞； 董影超； 李克荣；
天津工业大学； 天津市公安消防局； 中国安全生产科学研究院；
Author(s):
WU Yan-cui1; SONG Wen-hua1; XIE Fei1; 2; DONG Ying-chao1; LI Ke-rong1; 3
1.Tianjin Pol Ytechnic University,Tianjin 300381,China)(2.Tianjin Fire Corps,Tianjin 300381,China)(3.China Academy of Safety Science and Technology,Beijing 100012,China
关键词:
危险度;  蒙德法;  焦化装置
Keywords:
risk factor;  mond process;  coking unit
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过危险度评价法与蒙德法评分项目的比较分析,得出危险度评价法中的压力、温度和操作参数,反映在蒙德法中,表现为特殊工艺危险性的评分项,这表明利用简单、直观的危险度评价法,在一定程度上,可以表征复杂单元的危险性大小,且与蒙德法的评价相一致。以焦化装置为例子,首先只针对压力、温度和操作三个参数,运用两种评价法分别进行评价,得出的结论相一致,验证了上述结论;然后分别用两种方法对焦化装置进行评价,分析对比结果,危险度评价法在参数选取和运行中,更加简单直观,可以为蒙德法提供装置各单元危险性高低的依据并缩小评价的范围。蒙德法是危险度评价的拓展与延伸,它将危险度评价法得出的危险性高的单元,更深入的找出导致危险性高的原因与参数。
Abstract:
Through comparative analysis on the risk factor appraisal law and the mond process grading project,the pressure,temperature and operating parameter in the risk factor appraisal law were obtained,and when reflected in the mond process,they displayed as the grading item of special craft risky.It indicated that using simple,direct-viewing risk factor appraisal law may also characterize the dangers of complex unit in a certain extent and is consistent with mond process appraisal.Taking the coking unit as an example,first aiming at three parameters including pressure,temperature and operation,the appraisal was carried on separately utilizing two kinds of appraisal law.The consistent conclusions obtained were confirmed.Then two methods were applied to carry on the appraisal separately to the coking unit.By analyzing the contrast result,the risk factor appraisal law in the parameter selection and the movement was simpler and direct-viewing,might provide the basis of risk height for each unit in the plant and reduce the appraisal scope for the mond process.The mond process was the development and extends of risk factor appraisal,it selected the high risk unit which obtained by the risk factor appraisal law,further to find out the causes and the parameter of high risk.

参考文献/References:

[1]王厂亮.化工、石化生产装置安全评价的模式与方法[J].北工劳动保护,1998,19(5):6-10[2]吴宗之.危险评价方法及具体应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版版社,2001．[3]全民.安全评价方法及应用研究[D].南京:南京化工大学,2003．[4]蒋军成,郭振龙.安全系统工程.北京：化学工业出版社,2004,132—136[5]刘铁民，张兴凯.安全评价方法应用指南.北京：化学工业出版社，2005[6]陈萌.谈安全评价及其方法[J].工业安全与环保，1999，6.[7]英国帝国化学公司.蒙德部火灾、爆炸、毒性指数评价法．英国帝国化学公司，1991.10[8]马昕,张贝克,李欣龙.蒙德安全评价法的改进及其计算机实现[J].北京:中国安全生产科学技术.2009.5(1):108-109MA Xin，ZHANG Bei-ke，LI Xin-long.Improvement of mond seurity-evaluation and it’s computational implement[J]．Journal Safety Science and Technology，2009，5(1)：108-109[9]任治国,张树海,薛仲卿.蒙德法在垃圾焚烧发电厂安全评价中的应用[J].北京:中国安全生产科学技术.2011.7(1):124-125REN Zhi-guo,ZHANG Shn-hai,XUE Zhong-qing. Application of mond in the safety assessment of waste incineration power plant[J]．Journal Safety Science and Technology，2011，7(1)：124-125[10]国际化学品安全规划署，欧洲联盟委员会.国际化学品安全手册.北京:化学工业出版社，1999

相似文献/References:

[1]任治国,张树海,薛仲卿.蒙德法在垃圾焚烧发电厂安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(1):123.
　REN Zhi-guo,ZHANG Shu-hai,XUE Zhong-qing.Application of mond in the safety assessment of waste incineration power plant[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):123.
[2]宋文华,吴衍翠,谢飞,等.危险度评价法与蒙德法在催化裂化装置中的对比及原因研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(1):108.
　SONG Wen-hua,WU Yan-cui,XIE Fei,et al.Contrast and reason research on risk factor appraisal law and mond process in catalytic cracker[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):108.
[3]周科平,田勇刚.基于因子交互作用矩阵的采空区危险度评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.018]
　ZHOU Keping,TIAN Yonggang.Study on evaluation of goaf risk-degree based on factor interaction matrix[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(12):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-05-30
基金项目：国家自然科学基金(编号:50974096);天津市科技计划项目(编号:10ZCGYSF01600)
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-02-29