|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王永刚,吴潘根.民航人因失误分类框架[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):171-175.
 WANG Yong gang,WU Pan Gen.A framework of classifying human error for civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(6):171-175.
点击复制

民航人因失误分类框架()
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
5
期数:
2009年6
页码:
171-175
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
A framework of classifying human error for civil aviation
文章编号:
1673-193X(2009)-06-0171-05
作者:
王永刚吴潘根
中国民航大学 安全科学与工程学院
Author(s):
WANG Yonggang WU PanGen
School of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China
关键词:
民航人因失误人误分类人误模式行为过程
Keywords:
civil aviation human error human error classification human error modes behavior process
分类号:
X914
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人因失误分类是否系统、完整及对人误描述是否一致直接影响人误分析的结果。本文对民航中主要几种人误分析方法进行了详细评述,指出其在考虑人的认知过程和行为外在表现形式方面的不足。在对现有人误理论模型和人误分类方法详细分析的基础上,提出了民航人误分类框架。框架由人的行为过程的四个阶段“获取信息-分析处理信息-决策/计划-执行”和八类人误模式及相应的子模式构成。行为阶段与人误模式可针对具体活动进行组合,框架的使用具有灵活性。框架对保证民航中人误辨识结果的规范性和准确性具有重要意义。
Abstract:
It has a direct impact on the result of human error analysis that whether the human error classification is systematic and integrate and the description of human error is consistency. Based on a detailed analysis of the existing human error theoretical model and classification method, a framework of classifying human error for civil aviation is presented through the summarization of the staff behavior characteristics in flight, air traffic control and maintenance activities of civil aviation. Fourstage of human behavior process and eight kinds of human error modes and the corresponding submodes composed the framework. The fourstage is accessing information, analyzing and processing information, decisionmaking/planning and implementation. The behavior stages and human error models can be combined for specific activities, the use of the framework can be flexible. The framework can ensure that the result of human error identification in civil aviation is standardization and accuracy.

参考文献/References:

[1]HuanJyh Shyur. A quantitative model for aviation safety risk assessment[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008:34~44.[2]Douglas A. Wiegmann, Scott A. Shappell[美].飞行事故人的失误分析——人的因素分析与分类系统[M].马锐译.北京:中国民航出版社,2006:19~48.[3]中国民用航空总局航空器维修人的因素课题组.人的因素案例集——民用航空器维修差错[M].北京:中国民航出版社,2003:200~300.[4]黄宝军.空管人误分析方法(HERAJANUS)及应用[J].空中交通管理,2008,9:30~31.[5]杨家忠,张侃.民用航空中的人误分类与分析[J].人类工效学,2003,9(4):42~44.[6]何旭洪,黄瑞祥.工业系统中人的可靠性分析:原理、方法与应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.[7]廖可兵,张力,黄祥瑞.人的失误理论研究进展[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(7):47~48.[8]孙志强,史秀健,李欣欣等.基于认知模型的人为差错分类方法[J].国防科技大学学报,2008,30(1):74~75.[9]Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method(CREAM)[M].Elsevier Science Ltd,1998.[10]李鹏程,王以群,张力.人误模式与原因因素分析[J].工业工程与管理,2006,(1),95~96.

相似文献/References:

[1]史亚杰,陈艳秋.航空安全信息管理的问题与对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):116.
 SHI Ya-jie,CHEN Yan-qiu.Problems and countermeasures on aviation safety information management[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(6):116.
[2]胡晓,陈胜,石岿然,等.电梯检验过程中的人因失误分析与管理对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.031]
 HU Xiao,CHEN Sheng,SHI Kui ran,et al.Research on human error failure analysis and management countermeasures in the process of elevator inspection[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(6):160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.031]
[3]吴海涛,罗霞.基于直觉三角模糊TOPSIS的高铁列车调度指挥人因失误风险排序[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.024]
 WU Hai tao,LUO Xia.Risk prioritization model of human error for highspeed railwaydispatchers based on intuitionistic triangular fuzzy TOPSIS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(6):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.024]
[4]孙山.民航“重大突发事件情景构建”应用实例探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.030]
 SUN Shan.Discussion on application of the theory of scenes construction of emergency in the emergency management of civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(6):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.030]
[5]兰建义,乔美英,周英.基于灰色系统理论的煤矿人因事故关键因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(2):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.029]
 LAN Jian-yi,QIAO Mei-ying,ZHOU Ying.Analysis on critical factor of human error accidents in coal mine based on gray system theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(6):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.029]
[6]王文俊,张迎军,金雪松,等.基于GIS的机场应急救援演练系统开发与应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(3):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.03.027]
 WANG Wenjun,ZHANG Yingjun,JIN Xuesong,et al.Research on development and application of emergency rescue drill system based on GIS for civil aviation airport[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(6):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.03.027]
[7]钟虹,何沙.基于贝叶斯网络的连续管作业人因失误风险因素评价分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(5):144.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.05.020]
 ZHONG Hong,HE Sha.Evaluation and analysis on risk factors of human error in coiled tubing operation based on Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(6):144.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.05.020]
[8]袁晓芳,伍琦淇,孙林辉,等.智能煤矿下操作人员情境意识影响因素的多面分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(10):118.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.016]
 YUAN Xiaofang,WU Qiqi,SUN Linhui,et al.Multifaceted analysis on influencing factors of operators’ situation awareness in intelligent coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(6):118.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.016]
[9]何静,许佳璐,石杰红,等.基于改进DEMATEL—ISM法的地铁司机人因失误致因链分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(10):204.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.028]
 HE Jing,XU Jialu,SHI Jiehong,et al.Analysis on causation chain of human error for subway drivers based on improved DEMATEL-ISM method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(6):204.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.028]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-07-15 作者简介:王永刚,教授。
更新日期/Last Update: