|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈杰,石超,李求进,等.CNG加气站事故后果分析方法研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(5):78-82.
　CHEN Jie,SHI Chao,LI Qiu jin,et al.Research on analysis method for the accident consequence of CNG filling station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(5):78-82.
点击复制

CNG加气站事故后果分析方法研究*()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
5
期数:
2009年5
页码:
78-82
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on analysis method for the accident consequence of CNG filling station
文章编号:
1673-193X(2009)-05-0078-05
作者:
陈杰1; 石超1; 李求进2; 吴宗之3
1.北京科技大学土木与环境工程学院2.中国矿业大学（北京）资源与安全工程学院3.中国安全生产科学研究院
Author(s):
CHEN Jie;  SHI Chao;  LI Qiujin;  WU Zongzhi
1.Civil and Environment Engineering School2.China University of Mining and Technology Beijing3.China Acadeny of Safety Science and Technology
关键词:
CNG加气站; 安全; 公式; 事故后果; ALOHA软件
Keywords:
CNG filling station;  safety;  formula; accident consequence;  ALOHA software
分类号:
X937
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据CNG加气站系统运行的实际情况，将CNG加气站中易发生泄漏的设备分为管道阀门、挠性连接器、压缩机、储气设备、放散管5类。建立了CNG泄漏的事件树，将CNG加气站的事故后果类型概括为喷射火、闪火、蒸气云爆炸。总结了CNG加气站事故后果的计算模型，采用美国环保局的ALOHA软件确定事故后果的影响范围。综合运用该两种方法对喷射火和蒸气云爆炸的事故案例进行对比研究，结果表明，计算结果基本一致。该两种事故后果分析方法为CNG加气站安全管理和安全规划提供依据。
Abstract:
According to the running situation of the CNG filling station, the equipments apt to leaking were classified into 5 different kinds:the pipeline valve, flexible connector, the compressor, the gas storage system, and the dispersing pipe. The leaking event tree of CNG was established, the types of accident consequence were summarized as the jet fire, the flash fire, and the VCE. The calculation model of the CNG filling station was summarized, and the ALOHA of EPA was used to ensure the affecting area of the accident. Both the two methods are used to analysis the jet fire and the VCE, the contrastive result showed that both the empirical formula and the ALOHA can get the similar conclusions. The consequence analysis methods can provide evidence for the safety management of the CNG filling station and the safety planning.

参考文献/References:

［1］刘海燕.天然气加气站安全评价［D］.成都：西南石油大学，2007LIU Haiyan. Safety evaluation of the CNG filling station［D］.Chengdu：The Southwest Petrol University，2007［2］Epa. ALOHA(Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres)［DB/CD］. Washington:US Enviromental protection agency, National oceanic and atmospheric administration,2006［3］吴宗之，高进东，魏利军.危险评价方法及其应用［M］.北京：冶金工业出版社，2001.6［4］陈杰，李求进，吴宗之.100起CNG加气站事故的统计分析及对策研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2009，5（1）：71～75CHEN Jie, LI Qiujin, WU Zongzhi. Statistic analysis and countermeasure study on 100 CNG filling station accidents［J］.Journal of safety science and technology,2009，5（1）：71～75［5］GB 50156-2002，汽车加油加气站设计与施工规范［S］GB 50156-2002，Code for Design and Construction of Automobile Gasoline and Gas Filling Station［S］［6］郁永章，高其烈，冯兴全,等.天然气汽车加气站设备与运行［M］.北京：中国石化出版社，2006［7］“十五”国家科技攻关课题.城市公共安全规划技术、方法与程序研究［R］.北京：中国安全生产科学研究院，2005The tenthfive national technology tackling subject. The technology, method and procedure research of the urban public security［R］. Beijing:China academy of safety science and technology,2005［8］中国石油化工股份有限公司青岛安全工程研究院.石化装置定量风险评价［M］.北京：中国石化出版社，2007［9］梁平.天然气操作技术与安全管理［M］.北京：化学工业出版社，2006.5：4~6［10］CCPS. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis［M］. New York:the American institute of chemical engineers,2000［11］EPA, NOAA. ALOHA user manual［M/OL］.［2007 205208］http:/ /www.epa.gov/OEM/cameo/ aloha.html［12］刘俊峨，贾增科，李晓慧.城市燃气管道喷射火事故后果分析［J］.河北工程大学学报（自然科学版），2007，24（4）：53~56LIU June, JIA Zengke, LI Xiaohui. Consequence analysis of jet fire accident on urban gas pipeline［J］.Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Natural Science Edition),2007，24（4）：53~56［13］国家安全生产监督管理总局.安全评价［M］.北京：煤炭工业出版社，2005

相似文献/References:

[1]侯莹,伍彬彬,邓云峰,等.集输管线安全管理与应急系统的研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):98.
　HOU Ying,WU Bin bin,DENG Yun feng,et al.Study of safety and emergency management information system for gathering pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):98.
[2]李俊,李克宽.机械制造企业开展安全标准化工作的难点及对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):152.
　LI Jun,LI Ke-kuan.Difficulty and countermeasures of carrying ort safety standardization in machinery manufacturing enterprise[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):152.
[3]王瑜,刘毅.欧美、日本与中国个体防护标准比对[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):76.
　WANG Yu,LIU Yi.Comparison of personal protective standards in Europe, America, Japan and China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):76.
[4]李红民.FTA在高层建筑防火安全管理中的运用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):153.
　LI Hong-min.Application of FTA in fire prevention management of high-rise building analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):153.
[5]蔡勇,姚向宇.关于火电基建项目中安全管理工作的探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):165.
　CAI Yong,YAO Xiang-yu.Discussing about the security management of capital construction project in thermal power plant[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):165.
[6]刘伟虹.从尊重生命谈企业安全教育培训[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):169.
　LIU Wei-hong.Form the dignity of life to discuss the enterprise safety education[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):169.
[7]王文静,孙标,郭开华.液化天然气场站事故定量风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):114.
　WANG Wen-jing,SUN Biao,GUO Kai-hua.Quantitative Risk Analysis for LNG Station Accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):114.
[8]史亚杰,陈艳秋.航空安全信息管理的问题与对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):116.
　SHI Ya-jie,CHEN Yan-qiu.Problems and countermeasures on aviation safety information management[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):116.
[9]伍彬彬,李竞,冀铮,等.毒气泄漏事故监测预警系统的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):52.
　WU Bin-bin,LI Jing,JI Zheng,et al.Study on monitoring and predicting platform of toxic gas leakage accident situation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):52.
[10]王颖,胡双启,池致超,等.建筑安全事故成因分析及预警管理的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):112.
　WANG Ying HU Shuangqi CHI Zhichao LiuLili Li Yuan.The Cause Analysis Of Construction Safety AccidentAnd Early-Warning Research[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):112.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2008-06-22*基金项目：中国安科院基本科研业务费专项基金项目（编号：2008JBKY15）
更新日期/Last Update: