[1]王雅真,凌晓东,慕云涛,等.基于场景频率的石化装置气体探测覆盖率评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(2):97-103.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.02.013]
WANG Yazhen,LING Xiaodong,MU Yuntao,et al.Evaluation on gas detection coverage of petrochemical plant based on scene frequency[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(2):97-103.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.02.013]
点击复制
基于场景频率的石化装置气体探测覆盖率评估
WANG Yazhen,LING Xiaodong,MU Yuntao,et al.Evaluation on gas detection coverage of petrochemical plant based on scene frequency[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(2):97-103.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.02.013]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 20
- 期数:
- 2024年2期
- 页码:
- 97-103
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2024-02-29
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Evaluation on gas detection coverage of petrochemical plant based on scene frequency
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2024)-02-0097-07
- Keywords:
- safety engineering technology; gas detection system (GDS); scene frequency; gas dispersion simulation; scenario detection coverage
- 分类号:
- X937
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为解决现有评估方法未能定量分析泄漏场景发生频率在石化过程模块中的分布不均匀性，提出1种基于场景频率的石化装置气体探测覆盖率评估方法，包括典型泄漏场景库构建、基于计算流体动力学（CFD）的气体泄漏扩散行为仿真以及基于场景频率的探测覆盖率计算3个步骤；提出1种定量筛选方法以选择更具代表性的高频泄漏场景，在表征装置泄漏场景特点的同时节约计算资源。研究结果表明：通过引入泄漏场景频率对覆盖率评估计算公式进行升级，案例分析结果显示该计算方法能够更加真实准确地对气体探测系统有效性进行评估。研究结果可提高石化装置气体探测覆盖率评估工作的效率及准确性。
- Abstract:
- In order to solve the problem that the existing evaluation methods fail to quantitatively analyze the uneven distribution of leakage scene frequency in petrochemical process modules,an evaluation method for the gas detection coverage of petrochemical plants based on scene frequency was proposed,which included three steps: the construction of typical leakage scene library,the simulation of gas leakage and diffusion behavior based on CFD,and the calculation of detection coverage based on scene frequency.A quantitative screening method was proposed to select more representative high-frequency leak scenes,so as to characterize the leakage scene characteristics of the plant and save the computational resources at the same time.The results show that by introducing into the leakage scene frequency,the coverage evaluation formula is upgraded.The comparison of case study results indicates that the calculation method is able to evaluate the effectiveness of the gas detection system more realistically and accurately.
参考文献/References:
［1］张伟伟,肖华琴,黄小美.大型燃气用户可燃气体探测器选型分析［J］.煤气与热力,2013,33(11):19-22.
ZHANG Weiwei,XIAO Huaqin,HUANG Xiaomei.Analysis on type selection of combustible gas detectors for large gas consumers［J］.Gas & Heat,2013,33(11):19-22.
［2］吴斌.可燃有毒气体检测报警系统设计探讨［J］.石油化工自动化,2017,53(3):18-20.
WU Bin.Discussion on design of combustible and toxic gas detection alarm system［J］.Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry,2017,53(3):18-20.
［3］VERITAS D N.Accident statistics for fixed offshore units on the UK continental shelf 1980—2005［R］.RR566 Research Report.Health and Safety Executive,2007.
［4］刘宇,周艳.火灾和气体安全系统的探测器覆盖率评估与优化［J］.自动化技术与应用,2022,41(4):139-141.
LIU Yu,ZHOU Yan.Evaluation and optimization of detector coverage fire and gas safety system［J］.Techniques of Automation & Applications,2022,41(4):139-141.
［5］MARIOTTI E,PADOVA A D,BARBARESI T,et al.Development of improved strategies for the lay-out of fire and gas detectors［J］.Chemical Engineering Transactions,2014,36:283-288.
［6］VZQUEZ-ROMN R,DAZ-OVALLE C,QUIROZ-PREZ E,et al.A CFD-based approach for gas detectors allocation［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2016,78:1-9.
［7］WANG K,CHEN T,KWA S T,et al.Meta-modelling for fast analysis of CFD-simulated vapour cloud dispersion processes［J］.Computers & Chemical Engineering,2014,69:89-97.
［8］DEFRIEND S,DEJMEK M,PORTER L,et al.A risk-based approach to flammable gas detector spacing［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,159(1):142-151.
［9］LEE R W,KULESZ J J.A risk-based sensor placement methodology.［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,158(2-3):417-429.
［10］SEO J K,KIM D C,HA Y C,et al.A methodology for determining efficient gas detector locations on offshore installations［J］.Ships & Offshore Structures,2013,8(5):524-535.
［11］杨志华,宋佩月,付建民,等.原油储罐区可燃气体探测器布置优化方案研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(1):85-89.
YANG Zhihua,SONG Peiyue,FU Jianmin,et al.Study on layout optimization scheme of combustible gas detectors in crude oil storage tank area［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2021,17(1):85-89.
［12］慕云涛,张杰东,王雅真,等.罐区可燃气体探测器覆盖率评估及布置优化［J］.消防科学与技术,2022,41(3):375-378.
MU Yuntao,ZHANG Jiedong,WANG Yazhen,et al.Evaluation and layout optimization of combustible gas detector coverage［J］.Fire Science and Technology,2022,41(3):375-378.
［13］全国工业过程测量控制和自动化标准化技术委员会.智能工厂 安全监测有效性评估方法：GB/T 39173—2020 ［S］.北京：中国标准出版社，2020.
［14］LEGG S W,BENAVIDES-SERRANO A J,SIIROLA J D,et al.A stochastic programming approach for gas detector placement using CFD-based dispersion simulations［J］.Computers & Chemical Engineering,2012,47:194-201.
［15］王磊,陈国华,蒋利军.石化装置泄漏易发性评估方法及其应用研究［J］.石油化工设备,2009,38(1):79-84.
WANG Lei,CHEN Guohua,JIANG Lijun.Research and application of leak susceptibility assessment method in petrochemical plant［J］.Petro-Chemical Equipment,2009,38(1):79-84.
［16］BENAVIDES-SERRANO A J,LEGG S W,VZQUEZ-ROMN R,et al.A stochastic programming approach for the optimal placement of gas detectors:Unavailability and voting strategies［J］.Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2014,53(13):5355-5365.
［17］章博,王磊,王志刚.炼油装置有害气体泄漏区域风险等级划分［J］.中国石油大学学报：自然科学版,2015,39(5):144-149.
ZHANG Bo,WANG Lei,WANG Zhigang.Area risk level classification for hazardous gas release in petroleum refining installations［J］.Journal of China University of Petroleum,2015,39(5):144-149.
［18］杨哲.石化企业安全可靠性数据库手册：机械设备［M］.北京：中国石化出版社,2021:33-244.
［19］中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.石油化工可燃气体和有毒气体检测报警设计标准：GB/T 50493—2019 ［S］.北京：中国计划出版社，2019.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期： 2023-09-13
作者简介： 王雅真，硕士，工程师，主要研究方向为气体泄漏扩散、燃爆仿真与动态风险评估等。
