|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘自亮,熊思江,花争立,等.埋地输氢管道泄漏爆炸事故后果模拟分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(12):94-100.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.016]
　LIU Ziliang,XIONG Sijiang,HUA Zhengli,et al.Simulation analysis on leakage and explosion accident consequence of buried hydrogen pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(12):94-100.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.016]
点击复制

埋地输氢管道泄漏爆炸事故后果模拟分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年12期
页码:
94-100
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Simulation analysis on leakage and explosion accident consequence of buried hydrogen pipeline
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-12-0094-07
作者:
刘自亮; 熊思江; 花争立; 张银广; 徐平; 顾超华
（1.浙江大学 化工机械研究所，浙江 杭州 310027;
2.国家电投集团氢能科技发展有限公司，北京 102209;
3.高压过程装备与安全教育部工程研究中心，浙江 杭州 310027;
4.浙江大学应用力学研究所，浙江 杭州 310027）
Author(s):
LIU Ziliang;  XIONG Sijiang;  HUA Zhengli;  ZHANG Yinguang;  XU Ping;  GU Chaohua
(1.Institute of Process Equipment,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310027,China;
2.Hydrogen Energy Technology Development Co.,Ltd.,State Power Investment Corporation Limited,Beijing 102209,China;
3.Highpressure Process Equipment and Safety Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310027,China;
4.Institute of Applied Mechanics,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310027,China)
关键词:
输氢管道; FLACS; 泄漏; 爆炸; 事故后果; 危险区域
Keywords:
hydrogen pipeline;  FLACS;  leakage;  explosion;  accident consequence;  hazardous area
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了输氢管道的安全建设与运营，基于计算流体力学FLACS软件，模拟了埋地输氢管道在半受限空间内的泄漏爆炸事故后果，探讨了泄漏孔径、泄漏时长、输氢压力和环境风速对爆炸事故后果的影响规律，并得出相应的危险区域。结果表明：泄漏孔径、输氢压力和最大爆炸超压均与危险区域呈正相关关系，泄漏时长对事故后果几乎无影响；随着输氢压力的增大，危险区域受建筑物和风速的影响更为明显，在建筑物附近形成了狭长的危险区域带；最大爆炸超压和危险区域随环境风速的增大均呈现出先增大后减小的趋势。
Abstract:
For the safe construction and operation of hydrogen pipelines,based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software FLACS,the leakage and explosion accident consequence of buried hydrogen pipeline in the semiconfined space was studied.The influence of leakage hole diameter,leakage duration,hydrogen transport pressure and ambient wind speed on the explosion accident consequence were studied,and the corresponding hazardous areas were proposed.The results showed that the leakage hole diameter and hydrogen transport pressure were positively correlated with the maximum explosion overpressure and hazardous areas,while the leakage duration had little effect on the accident consequence.As the hydrogen transport pressure increased,the hazardous area was more affected by the buildings and wind speed,and the narrow and long hazardous area zone formed near the buildings.Both the maximum explosion overpressure and the hazardous areas increased first and then decreased with the increase of ambient wind speed.

参考文献/References:

［1］王赓,郑津洋,蒋利军,等.中国氢能发展的思考［J］.科技导报,2017,35(22):105110. WANG Geng,ZHENG Jinyang,JIANG Lijun,et al.The development of hydrogen energy in China［J］.Science & Technology Review,2017,35(22):105110.
［2］USDRIVE.Hydrogen delivery technical team roadmap［R］.California:Hydrogen Delivery Technical Team(HDTT),2017.
［3］毛宗强.将氢气输送给用户［J］.太阳能,2007(4):1820. MAO Zongqiang.Transport hydrogen gas to customers［J］.Solar Energy,2007(4):1820.
［4］WILKENING H,BARALDI D.CFD modelling of accidental hydrogen release from pipelines［J］.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007,32(13):22062215.
［5］刘延雷,徐平,郑津洋,等.管道输运高压氢气与天然气的泄漏扩散数值模拟［J］.太阳能学报,2008,29(10):12521255. LIU Yanlei,XU ping,ZHENG Jinyang,et al.Numerical simulation on the dispersion of hydrogen and natural gas due to high pressured pipeline leakage［J］.Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2008,29(10):12521255.
［6］赵博鑫,朱明,彭莹,等.基于PHAST软件模拟氢气、天然气管道泄漏［J］.石化技术,2017,24(5):4850. ZHAO Boxin,ZHU Ming,PENG Ying,et al.Simulation of leakage from hydrogen and natural gas pipelines based on PHAST［J］.Petrochemical Technology,2017,24(5):4850.
［7］ELIZABETH L,LEONARD C,SEUNGHO J,et al.Modeling of underground hydrogen pipelines［J］.Process Safety Progress,2013,32(2):212216.
［8］HANSEN O R,RENOULT J,SHERMAN M P.Validation of FLACShydrogen CFD consequence prediction model against large scale H2 explosion experiments in the flame facility［C］//International Conference on Hydrogen Safety,2005.
［9］MIDDHA P,HANSEN O R,STORVIK I E.Validation of CFDmodel for hydrogen dispersion［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(6):10341038.
［10］VYAZMINA E,JALLAIS S.Validation and recommendations for FLACS CFD and engineering approaches to model hydrogen vented explosions:Effects of concentration,obstruction vent area and ignition position［J］.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2016,41(33):1510115109.
［11］李雪芳.储氢系统意外氢气泄漏和扩散研究［D］.北京：清华大学,2015.
［12］BIRCH A D,BROWN D R,DODSON M G,et al.The structure and concentration decay of high pressure jets of natural gas［J］.Combustion Science and technology,1984,36(56):249261.
［13］BIRCH A D,HUGHES D J,SWAFFIELD F.Velocity decay of high pressure jets［J］.Combustion Science and Technology,1987,52(13):161171.
［14］MOLKOV V,MAKAROV D,BRAGIN M.Physics and modelling of underexpanded jets and hydrogen dispersion in atmosphere［J］.Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics Russian Academy of Sciences,2009.
［15］张小强,蒋庆梅.ASME B31.12标准在国内氢气长输管道工程上的应用［J］.压力容器,2015(11):4751. ZHANG Xiaoqiang,JIANG Qingmei.Application of ASME B31.12 in a domestic long distance hydrogen pipeline project［J］.Pressure Vessel Technology,2015(11):4751.
［16］周忠欣,周健南,金丰年,等.埋地天然气管道泄漏量计算与分析［J］.解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017(3):243248. ZHOU Zhongxin,ZHOU Jiannan,JIN Fengnian,et al.Caculation and analysis of buried gas pipeline leakage［J］.Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology(Natural science),2017(3):243248.
［17］李志勇,潘相敏,马建新.加氢站氢气事故后果量化评价［J］.同济大学学报（自然科学版）,2012,40(2):286291. LI Zhiyong,PAN Xiangmin,MA Jianxin.Quantitative assessment on hydrogen releases of hydrogen refueling station by consequence modeling［J］.Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2012,40(2):286291.
［18］MARANGON A,CARCASSI M,ENGEB A,et al.Safety distances:definition and values［J］.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007,32(13):21922197.
［19］李铮.空气冲击波作用下人的安全距离［J］.爆炸与冲击,1990(2):135144. LI Zheng.Safety distance for persons under blast air shock［J］.Explosion and Shock Waves,1990(2):135144.
［20］张杰东，于安峰，党文义，等.封闭式地面火炬爆炸事故后果模拟研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10):49-53. ZHANG Jiedong,YU Anfeng,DANG Wenyi,et al.Simulation on explosion of flammable gas in enclosed ground-flare［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2013,9(10):49-53.

相似文献/References:

[1]凌晓东 ,党文义 ,于安峰 ,等.环己烷泄漏事故模拟与风险控制措施研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(8):33.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.006]
　LING Xiao dong,DANG Wen yi,YU An feng,et al.Research on the simulation of cyclohexane leakage accidents and development of risk control measures[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(12):33.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.006]
[2]张杰东,于安峰,党文义,等.封闭式地面火炬爆炸事故后果模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10):49.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.10.009]
　ZHANG Jie dong,YU An feng,DANG Wen yi,et al.Simulation on explosion of flammable gas in enclosed groundflare[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(12):49.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.10.009]
[3]林小侦,于光认,魏利军,等.液化天然气在水面地面扩散对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(8):86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.015]
　LIN Xiao-zhen,YU Guang-ren,WEI Li-jun,et al.Comparative study of LNG dispersion on water and ground[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(12):86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.015]
[4]张印,赵东风,刘义.基于FLACS的CH4/CO2/air混合气爆炸参数分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.006]
　ZHANG Yin,ZHAO Dongfeng,LIU Yi.Analysis on explosion parameters of CH4/CO2/air mixed gas based on FLACS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(12):36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.006]
[5]杨冬冬,陈国明,师吉浩.海洋平台井喷含硫天然气扩散危险区域研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):114.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.08.018]
　YANG Dongdong,CHEN Guoming,SHI Jihao.Research on dangerous region of H2S-containing natural gas diffusion resulting from offshore platform blowout[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(12):114.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.08.018]
[6]陈旭芳,李云涛,帅健.水面LNG液池扩展模型的分析与对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):115.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.017]
　CHEN Xufang,LI Yuntao,SHUAI Jian.Analysis and comparative study on liquid pool spread model for LNG on water surface[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(12):115.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.017]
[7]杨志华,宋佩月,付建民,等.原油储罐区可燃气体探测器布置优化方案研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(1):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.01.014]
　YANG Zhihua,SONG Peiyue,FU Jianmin,et al.Study on layout optimization scheme of combustible gas detectors in crude oil storage tank area[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(12):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.01.014]
[8]程方明,张安邦,王焘,等.高压天然气非恒定速率泄漏扩散数值模拟研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(1):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.01.015]
　CHENG Fangming,ZHANG Anbang,WANG Tao,et al.Numerical simulation study on non-constant rate leakage and diffusion of highpressure natural gas[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(12):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.01.015]
[9]周波,梁爽,王鹏程,等.井喷喷射火热辐射影响范围与模型对比分析研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(2):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.02.021]
　ZHOU Bo,LIANG Shuang,WANG Pengcheng,et al.Comparative analysis on influence ranges and models of thermal radiation by jet fire in well blowout accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(12):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.02.021]
[10]李佳航,杨国梁,多英全,等.基于FLACS的海上钻探平台井喷爆炸事故后果模拟分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(6):155.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.023]
　LI Jiahang,YANG Guoliang,DUO Yingquan,et al.Simulation analysis on consequence of blowout and explosion accident on offshore drilling platform based on FLACS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(12):155.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.023]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2019-10-06；数字出版日期： 2019-12-25
* 基金项目： 国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0801500）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2019FZA4012）
作者简介： 刘自亮，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为高压氢气安全储输。
通信作者： 花争立，博士，主要研究方向为先进能源承压设备安全。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-09