|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]尹鑫伟,汪彤,代宝乾,等.基于PT-IE的区域性企业整体应急准备能力评估分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(8):137-143.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.022]
 YIN Xinwei,WANG Tong,DAI Baoqian,et al.Assessment and analysis of regional enterprises overall emergency preparedness capability based on prospect theory (PT) and information entropy (IE)[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(8):137-143.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.022]
点击复制

基于PT-IE的区域性企业整体应急准备能力评估分析
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年8期
页码:
137-143
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment and analysis of regional enterprises overall emergency preparedness capability based on prospect theory (PT) and information entropy (IE)
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-08-0137-07
作者:
尹鑫伟汪彤代宝乾谢昱姝王瑜
(北京市劳动保护科学研究所 城市有毒有害易燃易爆危险源控制技术北京市重点实验室,北京 100054)
Author(s):
YIN XinweiWANG TongDAI BaoqianXIE YushuWANG Yu
(Beijing Key Laboratory of City Toxic,Harmful,Flammable and Explosive Hazard Control Technology,Beijing Municipal Institute of Labour Protection,Beijing 100054,China)
关键词:
企业应急前景理论信息熵权应急能力评估
Keywords:
enterprise emergency prospect theory (PT) information entropy (IE) emergency capability assessment
分类号:
X913
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对传统评估方法在评价区域性企业整体应急能力的过程中未考虑评价者心理偏好与风险因素之间的关系,提出了1种基于前景理论(PT)与信息熵(IE)的评价模型,并设计了企业生产安全事故应急准备能力评价体系。首先以区属整体企业为单位构建心理损益矩阵,然后运用信息熵理论修正指标权重结构,最后依据前景理论计算得出各区、各指标的综合前景值并以此分析排序。实例表明:影响各区企业整体应急水平的共性问题在于应急组织体系不完善和应急救援力量不足,该模型对政府监管部门有针对性的分析和加强地区企业整体应急建设水平具有一定的指导意义。
Abstract:
Aiming at the problem that the traditional assessment methods have not considered the relationship between the evaluator’s psychological preference and the risk factors in the process of evaluating the overall emergency capability of regional enterprises,an evaluation method based on the prospect theory (PT) and information entropy (IE) was proposed,and the evaluation system of emergency preparedness capability for the work safety accidents of enterprises was designed.Firstly,a psychological profit and loss matrix was constructed by taking the overall enterprises owned by a district as the unit.Then the weight structure of indexes was corrected by using the IE theory.Finally,the comprehensive prospect values of each district and each index were obtained according to the PT theory,and they were analyzed and sorted.The case showed that the common problems affecting the overall emergency level of enterprises in each district were the imperfect emergency organization system and the insufficient emergency rescue force.This model has certain guiding significance for the government supervision department to analyze and strengthen the overall emergency construction level of regional enterprises with focused goal.

参考文献/References:

[1]中华人民共和国国家统计局.2018年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201902/t20190228_1651265.html,2019-02-28.
[2]江田汉,邓云峰,李湖生,等.基于风险的突发事件应急准备能力评估方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):35-41. JIANG Tianhan,DENG Yunfeng,LI Husheng,et al.Risk-based emergency response capability assessment method[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(7):35-41.
[3]苗成林,孙丽艳,杨力.基于多级模糊综合评价法的煤矿企业应急准备能力评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(11):103-108. MIAO Chenglin,SUN Liyan,YANG Li.Study on evaluation of coal mine enterprise emergency preparedness capability based on multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2013,9(11):103-108.
[4]安景文,安娴,王龙康,等.基于犹豫模糊集的生产安全事故应急预案评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(5):128-133. AN Jingwen,AN Xian,WANG Longkang,et al.Research on emergency plan of production safety accident based on hesitant fuzzy set[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(5):128-133.
[5]张少刚,赵媚,倪小敏,等.基于AHP-模糊评价的化工园区综合应急准备能力研究[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(1):77-83. ZHANG Shaogang,ZHAO Mei,NI Xiaomin,et al.Research on comprehensive emergency preparedness ability of chemical industry park based on AHP-fuzzy Evaluation[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2015,15(1):77-83.
[6]葛悦,汪彤,徐亚博.基于灰色层次分析法的突发事件应急管理能力评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):109-114. GE Yue,WANG Tong,XU Yabo.Evaluation of emergency management ability based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2014,10(12):109-114.
[7]张利华,黄荣宝,李颖明,等.对杭州市部分自然灾害应急预案完备性评价的实证研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2009,19(9):5-11. ZHANG Lihua,HUANG Rongbao,LI Yingming,et al.An empirical study on the completeness evaluation of some natural disaster emergency plans in Hangzhou[J].China Safety Science Journal,2009,19(9):5-11.
[8]KROHLING R A,DE SOUZA T T M.Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making [J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39:11487-11493.
[9]QIN J,LIU X,PEDRYCZ W.An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment [J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2015,86:116-130.
[10]KAHNEMAN D,TVERSKY A.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometric,1979,47(2):263-292.
[11]李心丹.行为金融学——理论及中国的证据[M].上海:上海三联书店,2004:62-65.
[12]TVERSKY A,KAHNEMAN D.Advances in prospect theory:cumulative representation of uncertainty [J].Risk Uncertainty,1992(5):297-323.
[13]刘云志,樊治平.基于前景理论的具有指标期望的多指标决策方法[J].控制与决策,2015,30(1):91-97. LIU Yunzhi,FAN Zhiping.Multi-index decision making method with index expectation based on prospect theory[J].Control and Decision,2015,30(1):91-97.
[14]ABBAS A E.Maximum entropy utility[J].Operations Research,2006,54(2):277-290.
[15]宋之杰,王浩,赵红美,等.基于效用风险熵的多情景混合型风险决策方法及应用[J].系统工程与电子技术,2018,40(12):51-57. SONG Zhijie,WANG Hao,ZHAO Hongmei,et al.Multi-scenario hybrid risk decision making method based on utility risk entropy and its application[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2018,40(12):51-57.

相似文献/References:

[1]苏秀丽,罗贤运,吕保和.基于前景理论突发水污染事件个体行为研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.028]
 SU Xiuli,LUO Xianyun,LV Baohe.Research on individual behavior in emergency event of water pollution based on prospect theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(8):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.028]
[2]陈伟珂,林宏莉.基于前景理论的地铁施工灾后重建方案决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):143.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.027]
 CHEN Weike,LIN Hongli.Research on decision-making of post-disaster reconstruction scheme for subway construction based on prospect theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(8):143.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.027]
[3]郑彦辉,朱昌锋,王啸.基于双层规划的应急物资调配研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(5):25.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.05.004]
 ZHENG Yanhui,ZHU Changfeng,WANG Xiao.Research on allocation of emergency material based on bilevel programming[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(8):25.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.05.004]
[4]杨耀红,曾怡,代静,等.基于前景理论的施工安全事故网络舆论监督演化博弈分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(1):132.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.021]
 YANG Yaohong,ZENG Yi,DAI Jing,et al.Evolutionary game analysis on network public opinion supervision of construction safety accidents based on prospect theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(8):132.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.021]
[5]高坤,杨春辉.机场不停航施工安全监管策略博弈分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(6):141.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.021]
 GAO Kun,YANG Chunhui.Game analysis on safety supervision strategy of airport non-stop construction[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(8):141.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.021]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-06-02
* 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2018YFF0301003);2019年度北京市市级财政项目(PXM2019_178304_000008)
作者简介: 尹鑫伟,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全风险评估、应急管理。
通信作者: 汪彤,研究员,主要研究方向为职业安全健康评价与风险评估。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-04