|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王治莹,杨学亮,梁敬.官方媒体参与下不同风险感知群体竞争模型及其演化规律[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):19-24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.003]
 WANG Zhiying,YANG Xueliang,LIANG Jing.A competition model and its evolution law of groups with different risk perception under the participation of official media[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(4):19-24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.003]
点击复制

官方媒体参与下不同风险感知群体竞争模型及其演化规律
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年4期
页码:
19-24
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A competition model and its evolution law of groups with different risk perception under the participation of official media
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-03-0019-06
作者:
王治莹杨学亮梁敬
(安徽工业大学 管理科学与工程学院,安徽 马鞍山 243032)
Author(s):
WANG Zhiying YANG Xueliang LIANG Jing
(School of Management Science & Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan Anhui 243032, China)
关键词:
突发事件官方媒体风险感知演化规律
Keywords:
emergency event official media risk perception evolution law
分类号:
X913.4;C912.6
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为识别公众风险感知的演化规律和官方媒体参与的作用机制,首先,根据公众的行为表现划分不同风险感知群体,并分析群体间的相互竞争和官方媒体的扰动作用;然后,通过扩展LotkaVolterra模型建立群体间的相互竞争模型;在此基础上,通过推导模型平衡点及其稳定性分析模型演化规律;最后,运用数值仿真考查了官方媒体的参与对模型演化的影响。研究结果表明:模型演化具有3种结果情景,官方媒体参与能够显著改变模型演化的速度和结果。
Abstract:
It is of great significance to identify the evolution law of public risk perception and the mechanism of participation of official media in order to maintain the response order and implementation of plans. Firstly, groups with different risk perception are divided according to public behavior, and the competition between different groups and the disturbance of official media are analyzed. Then, a mutual competition model is established through extending the LotkaVolterra model between groups. Further, the model equilibrium point and its stability of are derived to analyze the evolution law of this model. Finally, numerical simulation is conducted to examine the effect of the participation of official media on the evolution of the proposed model evolution. The results show that there are three scenarios of evolution results of the model, and the participation of official media can significantly change evolution speed and result of the model.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘万利, 胡培. 创业风险对创业决策行为影响的研究—风险感知与风险倾向的媒介效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(9): 163-167. LIU Wanli, HU Pei. The impact of entrepreneurial risk on entrepreneurial decision-making behavior tendencies-The media effects of risk perception and risk preferences[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2010, 31(9): 163-167.
[2]王治莹, 岳朝龙. 舆情传播中考虑公众风险感知的多资源流应急优化调度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6): 115-123. WANG Zhiying, YUE Chaolong. Emergency optimal scheduling of multi-resource flow considering the public’s risk perception in public opinion propagation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(6): 115-123.
[3]ZHAO L, CUI H, QIU X, et al. SIR rumor spreading model in the new media age[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2013, 392(4): 995-1003.
[4]GIERLACH E, BELSHER B E, BEUTLER L E. Cross-cultural differences in risk perceptions of disasters[J]. Risk Analysis, 2010, 30(10): 1539-1549.
[5]WEI J, WANG F, ZHAO D. A risk perception model: Simulating public response to news reports in China[J]. Information Research, 2012, 17(2): 411-436.
[6]马颖, 张园园, 宋文广. 食品行业突发事件风险感知的传染病模型研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(9): 123-130. MA Ying, ZHANG Yuanyuan, SONG Wenguang. Research on epidemic model of emergency events risk perception in food industry[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(9): 123-130.
[7]钟慧玲, 李伟, 张冠湘. “邻避”冲突事件网络舆情演化研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(3): 111-117. ZHONG Huiling, LI Wei, ZHANG Guanxiang. Research on the evolution of internet public opinion for “NIMBY” conflict event[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016, 35(3): 111-117.
[8]王旭坪, 杨相英, 杨挺, 等. 动态路况下考虑决策者风险感知的地震物资调配动力学模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015,24(2): 174-184. WANG Xuping, YANG Xiangying, YANG Ting, et al. System dynamic model of earthquake material allocation considering decision-makers’ psychological risk perception and dynamic traffic[J]. Journal of Systems and Management, 2015, 24(2): 174-184.
[9]DASH N, GLADWIN H. Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses: Individual and household[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2007, 8(3): 69-77.
[10]SUDO A, YAMAUCHI T. Risk cognition and risk behaviors concerning sexual victimization in female undergraduates[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2010, 49(1): 13-18.
[11]成俊会, 赵金楼. 基于信息风险感知的社交网络舆情传播模型研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(1): 134-138. CHENG Junhui, ZHAO Jinlou. A public opinion dissemination model on social networks based on perception of risks[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(1): 134-138.
[12]NORDFJRN T, RUNDMO T. Personality, risk cognitions and motivation related to demand of risk mitigation in ransport among Norwegians[J]. Safety science, 2015 (73): 15-22.
[13]HUNG H C, CHIU Y C, HUANG H C, et al. An enhanced application of Lotka–Volterra model to forecast the sales of two competing retail formats[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017(109): 325-334.
[14]兰月新, 夏一雪, 刘冰月, 等. 面向舆情大数据的网民情绪演化机理及趋势预测研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(11): 134-140. LAN Yuexin, XIA Yixue, LIU Bingyue, et al. Research on the evolution mechanism and trend prediction of netizens for public opinion big data[J]. Journal of Intelligence,2017,36(11):134-140.
[15]PINHEIRO S. Optimal harvesting for a logistic growth model with predation and a constant elasticity of variance[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 260(1-2): 461-480.
[16]王进良, 张令元. 三种竞争种群的古典Gause-Lotka- Volterra系统[J]. 生物数学学报, 1995, 10(4); 164-173. WANG Jinliang, ZHANG Lingyuan. The classic Gause- Lotka-Volterra system of competition among three species[J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 1995, 10(4): 164-173.

相似文献/References:

[1]江田汉,邓云峰,李湖生,等.基于秩和比法的突发事件固有风险水平评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):34.
 JIANG Tian-han,DENG Yun-feng,LI Hu-sheng,et al.Inherent risk assessment of emergency incidents based on the rank sum ratio method in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(4):34.
[2]吴发旺.电力突发事件应急管理中的博弈[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):73.
 WU Fa-wang.Game on emergency management of power incident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):73.
[3]江田汉,邓云峰,李湖生,等.基于风险的突发事件应急准备能力评估方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):35.
 JIANG Tianhan DENG Yunfeng LI Husheng LIU Tiemin JIANG Chuansheng WANG Jianguang WANG Jingjing.Risk-based assessment model for emergency preparedness capability of emergency incidents in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):35.
[4]刘铁民.突发事件应急预案体系概念设计研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):5.
 LIU Tie-min.Design of the emergency plan system’s concept[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):5.
[5]杨力.突发事件应急意识和能力建设探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):154.
 YANG Li.Study on ascension of emergency consciousness and ability construction[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):154.
[6]郑霞忠,胡斌锋,郑烜.基于水电工程的应急执行力构成要素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):149.
 ZHENG Xia-zhong,HU Bin-feng,ZHENG Xuan.An analysis on the constituent elements of emergency execution based on the hydropower project[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):149.
[7]李群.突发事件应急推演系统平台分析与设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):120.
 LI Qun.Analysis and design of simulated emergency exercise system platform[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):120.
[8]刘铁民.应急预案重大突发事件情景构建* ——基于“情景-任务-能力”应急预案编制技术研究之一[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(4):5.
 LIU Tie min.Studies on scenes’ construction of emergency planning ——part I of emergency planning technology based on “scenetaskability”[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):5.
[9]王爱莎,彭〓伟.突发事件下某教室的人员疏散研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):163.
 WANG Ai sha,PENG Wei.Study on emergency evacuation of a classroom[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):163.
[10]杨力,邢娟娟.学校突发事件应急管理与预案模式探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):139.
 YANG Li,XING Juan-juan.Study on emergency management and plan mode of incident in school[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(4):139.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2018-06-09
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(71704001,71601002,71572125);安徽省自然科学基金项目(1808085QG224;1708085MG168);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKY2018D13)
作者简介: 王治莹,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为舆情危机管理,突发事件应急管理,系统优化与决策分析。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-09