|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨新湦,任治.基于尾涡强度的无人机与民机纵向安全间隔评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(10):64-69.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.010]
 YANG Xinsheng,REN Zhi.Research on assessment of longitudinal safety separation between UAV and civil aircraft based on trailing vortex intensity[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(10):64-69.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.010]
点击复制

基于尾涡强度的无人机与民机纵向安全间隔评估研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年10期
页码:
64-69
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2018-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on assessment of longitudinal safety separation between UAV and civil aircraft based on trailing vortex intensity
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-10-0064-06
作者:
杨新湦任治
(中国民航大学 空中交通管理学院,天津 300300)
Author(s):
YANG Xinsheng REN Zhi
(College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
关键词:
空中交通管理无人机管控尾涡消散碰撞风险位置误差
Keywords:
air traffic management unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) management and control trailing vortex dissipation collision risk position error
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了解决无人机频频入侵机场净空,与民航客机发生危险接近的问题,以碰撞风险为量化指标,对无人机与民机需要保持的纵向安全间隔进行评估研究。分析民机尾涡流场对无人机运行的影响,利用Crow近场涡强度消散理论,得到实际尾迹影响区改进Reich碰撞模板,据此建立CNS/GPS性能环境下的纵向间隔评估模型,通过Matlab进行间隔值求解。研究结果表明:模型可以较为准确地反映民机起飞初始爬升阶段无人机尾随运行时导航性能和尾涡迹对所需最小间隔值的影响,并得到给定安全目标水平的计算结果。
Abstract:
In order to solve the problem that the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) have frequently intruded into the airport clearance and happened the nearmiss with the civil aircraft, the longitudinal safety separation that should be maintained between the UAV and civil aircraft was assessed and studied by taking the collision risk as the quantitative index. The influence of trailing vortex flow field of civil aircraft on the operation of UAV was analyzed, and the improved Reich collision template of the practical wake influence zone was obtained by using the Crow near field vortex intensity dissipation theory. On this basis, an assessment model of longitudinal separation under the environment of CNS/GPS performance was established, and the separation value was solved by using Matlab. The results showed that the model could more accurately reflect the influence of navigation performance and trailing vortex wake on the required minimum separation value during the takeoff initial climbing period of civil aircraft with the following operation of UAV, and the calculation results of given safety target level could be obtained.

参考文献/References:

[1]REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards[J].Journal of the Institute of Navigation,1966,19(1):88-98.
[2]徐肖豪,李冬宾,李雄.飞行间隔安全评估研究[J].航空学报,2008,29(6):1411-1418. XU Xiaohao, LI Dongbin, LI Xiong. Research on safety assessment of flight separation[J].Acta Aeronauticaet Astronauticasinica,2008,29(6):1411-1418.
[3]张兆宁,刘计民,王莉莉.基于CNS性能的平行航路纵向碰撞风险评估[J].西南交通大学学报,2009,44(6):918-925. ZHANG Zhaoning, LIU Jimin, WANG Lili. Longitudinal collision risk assessment based on the properties of the CNS[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2009,44(6):918-925.
[4]黄宝军.基于CNS性能的平行航路侧向碰撞风险模型[J].西南交通大学学报,2012,47(6):1075-1080. HUANG Baojun. Lateral collision risk model on parallel routes based on communication, navigation and surveillance performances[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2012,47(6):1075-1080.
[5]张兆宁,高俊霞.自由飞行下基于高斯白噪声的碰撞风险模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(9):176-180. ZHANG Zhaoning, GAO Junxia. Collision risk model based on White Gaussian Noise under free flight[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2014,10(9):176-180.
[6]翟文鹏,齐莉,张诗童.采用飞行流模拟方法的ADS-B平行航路纵向安全间隔评估[J].飞行力学,2015,33(5):464-466. ZHAI Wenpeng, QI Li, ZHANG Shitong. ADS-B parallel route longitudinal safety interval evaluation with flight flow simulation method[J].Flight Dynamics,2015,33(5):464-466.
[7]FRECH M, ZINNER T. Wake vortex behavior classes and their initial validation[J].Journal of Aircraft,2004,41(3):564-570.
[8]SAROKAYA T. New model for vortex decay in the atmosphere[J].Journal of Aircraft,2000,37(1):53-61.
[9]魏志强,徐肖豪.飞机尾涡流场的建模与仿真计算研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(4):186-191. WEI Zhiqiang, XU Xiaohao. Modeling and simulating of flow field for aircraft wake vortex[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2010,10(4):186-191.
[10]周彬,王雪松,王国玉,等.飞机尾流的快速建模方法[J].航空动力学报,2009,24(1):110-115. ZHOU Bin, WANG Xuesong, WANG Guoyu, et al. Fast modeling method for aircraft wake vortices[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2009,24(1):110-115.
[11]魏志强.尾涡流场及安全间隔的建模与仿真计算研究[D].天津:中国民航大学,2008.
[12]GILSON W H. Radar measurement of aircraft wakes[C]//Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratories,1991.
[13]CROW S C. Motion of a vortex pair in a stably stratified fluid, Poseidon research[C]//Santa Monica,CA,1974.
[14]施妙根. 科学和工程计算基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1999.
[15]KARAMCHETI K. Principles of Ideal Fluid Aerodynamics[M].Amazon.com: Robert E.Krieger Publishing Co,1980.
[16]张兆宁,沈金炜,刘计民.基于CNS定位误差的侧向碰撞风险模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2009,9(6):110-113. ZHANG Zhaoning, SHEN Jinwei, LIU Jimin. Lateral collision risk model based on CNS position error[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2009,9(6):110-113.
[17]张兆宁,时瑞军.自由飞行下基于冲突解脱的碰撞风险模型研究[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(2):157-161. ZHANG Zhaoning, SHI Ruijun. Study on free flight collision risk model based on conflict resolution[J].Safety and Environmental Engineering,2016,23(2):157-161.
[18]翟文鹏,吴昊,王莉莉,等.用粒子滤波改进的飞行冲突探测算法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(6):105-108. ZHAI Wenpeng, WU Hao, WANG Lili, et al. Particle filtering-based flight conflict detection algorithm[J].China Safety Science Journal,2014,24(6):105-108.
[19]翟文鹏,李亚飞.飞行目标航迹生成及冲突探测算法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2013,23(10):110-113. ZHAI Wenpeng, LI Yafei. Research of flight track generation and conflict detection algorithm[J].China Safety Science Journal,2013,23(10):110-113.
[20]张明,张艳玲.自由飞行下基于CNS性能与速度误差的最小安全间距研究[J].航空计算技术,2015(5):41-45. ZHANG Ming, ZHANG Yanling. Research on minimum safety distance in free flight based on CNS performance and speed error[J].Aeronautical Computing Technique,2015(5):41-45.

相似文献/References:

[1]康瑞,杨凯.考虑等待位置的航空器交叉滑行冲突概率模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(8):64.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.010]
 KANG Rui,YANG Kai.Model on conflict probability of aircraft crosstaxiing considering holding position[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(10):64.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.010]
[2]孙禾,陈一新.基于多标准和改进Siamese网络的相似航班号判断方法研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(1):47.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.01.007]
 SUN He,CHEN Yixin.Research on judgment method of similar call signs based on multi standards and improved Siamese network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(10):47.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.01.007]
[3]康瑞,杨凯.考虑驾驶方式的车辆与航空器交叉冲突评估*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(2):218.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.02.030]
 KANG Rui,YANG Kai.Assessment on cross conflict of vehicle and aircraft considering driving modes[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(10):218.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.02.030]
[4]刘颖俪,胡明华,苏佳明,等.基于多目标优化的机场机坪管制区域划分方法研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(8):150.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.08.022]
 LIU Yingli,HU Minghua,SU Jiaming,et al.Division method of airport apron control areas based on multi-objective optimization[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(10):150.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.08.022]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2018-06-13;数字出版日期:2018-10-24
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(U1533129);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(61603396)
作者简介: 杨新湦,硕士,教授,主要研究方向为空中交通管制安全。
通信作者: 任治,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为空中交通管制安全间隔理论。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-07