|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘玮,刘淑琴.MOA视角下公众极端气候灾害信息规避行为生成机制研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2025,21(3):58-69.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.03.008]
　LIU Wei,LIU Shuqin.Research on generation mechanism of public information avoidance behavior for extreme climate disasters from perspective of MOA[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2025,21(3):58-69.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.03.008]
点击复制

MOA视角下公众极端气候灾害信息规避行为生成机制研究*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
21
期数:
2025年3期
页码:
58-69
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2025-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on generation mechanism of public information avoidance behavior for extreme climate disasters from perspective of MOA
文章编号:
1673-193X(2025)-03-0058-12
作者:
刘玮; 刘淑琴
（湖南农业大学 公共管理与法学学院，湖南 长沙 410128）
Author(s):
LIU Wei;  LIU Shuqin
(Faculty of Public Administration and Law,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha Hunan 410128,China)
关键词:
极端气候灾害; 信息规避行为; MOA框架; CAPS
Keywords:
extreme climate disaster;  information avoidance behavior;  MOA framework;  CAPS
分类号:
X915.5；X43
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.03.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为厘清公众极端气候灾害信息规避行为的生成机制，采用MOA框架与认知-情感加工系统理论(CAPS)构建公众极端气候灾害信息规避行为的生成机制模型，引入PLS-SEM和fsQCA方法对问卷样本予以检验。研究结果表明：PLS-SEM方法得出公众极端气候灾害信息规避行为受动机、机会与能力3类因素影响。其中，动机层因素中感知价值与应急安全意识负向引导心理抗拒；机会层因素中心理距离正向引导倦怠情绪；能力层因素中自我效能负向引导焦虑情绪，最终促成信息规避行为。fsQCA分析发现，公众极端灾害信息规避行为生成过程中存在“机会-能力优先驱动”型、“动机-机会-能力并驾齐驱”型及“动机-机会-能力共同约束”型3条组态路径。研究结果可为提升极端气候灾害信息传播效果和公众极端气候灾害防范与应对能力提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to clarify the generation mechanism of the public information avoidance behavior for extreme climate disasters,the motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) framework and cognitive-emotional processing system theory (CAPS) were used to construct a model on the generation mechanism of public information avoidance behavior for extreme climate disasters,and the PLS-SEM and fsQCA methods were introduced to test the questionnaire samples.The results show that through the PLS-SEM method,it is found that the public information avoidance behavior for extreme climate disasters is affected by three types of factors: motivation,opportunity and ability.Among them,the perceived value and the emergency safety awareness of the motivation layer negatively guide the psychological resistance,the psychological distance of the opportunity layer positively guides the burnout emotion,and the self-efficacy of the ability layer negatively guides the anxiety,eventually contributing to the information avoidance behavior.Through the fsQCA analysis,it is found that there are three configuration paths in the generation prcess of public information avoidance behavior for extreme disasters,namely “opportunity-ability priority driven”,“motivation-opportunity-ability parallel driven” and “motivation-opportunity-ability joint constraint”.The research results can provide reference for improving the information dissemination effect of extreme climate disasters and the public ability to prevent and respond to extreme climate disasters.

参考文献/References:

［1］IPCC.Climate change 2021:the physical science basis ［M］.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2021.
［2］高美勋,陈敏鹏,滕飞.“一带一路”沿线国家适应气候变化的技术需求评估［J］.气候变化研究进展,2022,18(6):731-742. GAO Meixun,CHEN Minpeng,TENG Fei.Technology needs assessment for adaptation to climate change in the Belt and Road countries ［J］.Climate Change Research,2022,18(6):731-742.
［3］中华人民共和国应急管理部.国家防灾减灾救灾委员会办公室 应急管理部发布2023年全国自然灾害基本情况［EB/OL］.(2024-01-20)［2024-06-20］.https://www.mem.gov.cn/xw/yjglbgzdt/202401/t20240120_475697.shtml.
［4］GUO Y,LU Z,KUANG H,et al.Information avoidance behavior on social network sites:Information irrelevance,overload,and the moderating role of time pressure［J］.International Journal of Information Management,2020,52:102067.
［5］JUNG M,RAMANADHAN S,VISWANATH K.Effect of information seeking and avoidance behavior on self-rated health status among cancer survivors［J］.Patient Education & Counseling,2013,92(1):100-106.
［6］MYRICK J G,KIM H K,AHN J,et al.Effects of COVID-19 misinformation on information seeking,avoidance,and processing:a multicountry comparative study［J］.Science Communication,2020,42(5):586-615.
［7］MCCLOUD R F,JUNG M,GRAY S W,et al.Class,race and ethnicity and information avoidance among cancer survivors［J］.British Journal of Cancer,2013,108(10):1949-1956.
［8］HOWELL L J,SHEPPERD A J.Social exclusion,self-affirmation,and health information avoidance［J］.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2017:6821-6826.
［9］KANNAN V D,VEAZIE P J.Who avoids going to the doctor and why?Audience segmentation analysis for application of message development［J］.Health Communication,2015,30(7):635-645.
［10］NORTON J L,RACITI M M.Co-creating healthful eating behaviors with very young children:the impact of information overload on primary caregivers［J］.Health marketing quarterly,2017,34(1):18-34.
［11］陈则谦.MOA模型的形成、发展与核心构念［J］.图书馆学研究,2013(13):53-57. CHEN Zeqian.The formation,development and core constructs of MOA ［J］.Research on Library Science,2013(13):53-57.
［12］彭丽徽,蒋欣.风险认知视域下社交媒体用户健康信息规避行为生成机理研究［J］.图书情报工作,2022,66(22):55-65. PENG Lihui,JIANG Xin.A study on the generation mechanism of social media users’ health information avoidance behaviors under the risk perception perspective［J］.Library and Information Service,2022,66(22):55-65.
［13］MISGHEL W,SHODA Y.A cognitive-affective system theory of personality:reconceptualizing situations,dispositions,dynamics,and invariance in personality structure ［J］.Psychological Review,1995,102(2):246.
［14］吕书鹏,高功成.“建议专家不要建议”:公共卫生事件中的大众“信息厌倦”研究［J］.公共管理评论,2024,6(1):5-25. LV Shupeng,GAO Gongcheng.“Advise the experts not to advise”:research on“message fatigue”during public health emergencies［J］.China Public Administration Review,2024,6(1):5-25.
［15］吴布林,薛冬,杨克.重大突发公共事件中社交媒体用户信息行为研究［J］.情报理论与实践,2021,44(10):137-141. WU Bolin,XUE Dong,YANG Ke.Research on the information behavior of social media users in major public emergencies ［J］.Information Studies:Theory & Application,2021,44(10):137-141.
［16］CHEN F,LOU J,HU J,et al.Study on the relationship between crisis awareness and medical waste separation behavior shown by residents during the COVID-19 epidemic［J］.Science of The Total Environment,2021,787(4):147522.
［17］BREHM J W.Psychological reactance:theory and applications［J］.Advances in Consumer Research,1989,16(1):72-75.
［18］KIM K,ZHANG M,LI X.Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer Evaluations［J］.Journal of Consumer Research,2008,35(4):706-713.
［19］尚志海.基于心理距离的灾害可接受风险研究［J］.灾害学,2018,33(3):12-16,28. SHANG Zhihai.Study on disaster acceptable risk based on psychological distance ［J］.Journal of catastrophology,2018,33(3):12-1628.
［20］ROETZEL P G.Information overload in the information age:a review of the literature from business administration,business psychology,and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development［J］.Business Research,2019(2):479-522.
［21］郭彦丽,付旭,陈建斌.人机交互场景下用户知识吸收能力影响因素的组态分析［J］.经济问题,2024(6):51-57. GUO Yanli,FU Xu,CHEN Jianbin.Factors affecting user’s knowledge absorption ability in human-computer interaction scenario ［J］.On Economic problems,2024(6):51-57.
［22］WURMAN R S.Information anxiety［M］.New York:Doubleday,1989.
［23］BANDURA A W.H.,LIGHTSEY R.Self-efficacy:the exercise of control［J］.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy,1999,13(2):158-166.
［24］KESTLER-PELEG M,LAVENDA O,STENGER V,et al.Maternal self-efficacy mediates the association between spousal support and stress among mothers of NICU hospitalized preterm babies［J］.Early human development,2020:146.
［25］王新平,杨子琳,苏畅.正念对应急疏散行为：风险感知和自我效能的中介作用［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(8):210-215. WANG Xinping,YANG Zilin,SU Chang.Mindfulness to emergency evacuation:the mediating role of risk perception and self-efficacy ［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2022,18(8):210-215.
［26］CLARENCE S.The social dimensions of the preventive efficient stress situation model (PRESS) questionnaire in light of the general self-efficacy,health belief model,the theory of care-seeking behavior,and symbolic interactionism in healthcare［J］.Cogent Social Sciences,2016,2(1):1234669.
［27］KRISS L A,QUICK B L,RAINS S A,et al.Psychological reactance theory and COVID-19 vaccine mandates:the roles of magnitude and direction of threat［J］.Journal of Health Communication,2022,27(9):654-663.
［28］马海云,薛翔.用户信息搜寻到信息规避的演化机制研究——以突发公共卫生事件领域为例［J］.现代情报,2024,44(9):107-118,130. MA Haiyun,XUE Xiang.Research on the evolutionary mechanism from information seeking to information avoidence:a study in public health emergencies ［J］.Journal of Modern Information,2024,44(9):107-118,130.
［29］ZHANG S,ZHAO L,LU Y,et al.Do you get tired of socializing?An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services［J］.Information & Management,2016,53(7):904-914.
［30］刘鲁川,李旭,张冰倩.基于扎根理论的社交媒体用户倦怠与消极使用研究［J］.情报理论与实践,2017,40(12):100-106,51. LIU Luchuan,LI Xu,ZHANG Bingqian.Research on social media fatigue and passive behaviors of users based on Grounded Theory ［J］.Information Sdudies:Theory & Application,2017,40(12):100-106,51.
［31］EYSENCK M W.Anxiety:the cognitive perspective［M］.Hore,England:Erlbarm,1993.
［32］郭宇,张传洋,刘梦婷,等.用户信息焦虑纾解驱动医疗健康大数据价值实现影响因素与路径研究［J］.图书情报工作,2023,67(15):25-34. GUO Yu,ZHANG Chuanyang,LIU Mengting,et al.Research on influencing factors and paths for the reduction of users’ information anxiety drives tne realization of the value of medical and health big data ［J］.Library and Information Service,2023,67(15):25-34.
［33］顾东晓,孙佳月,丁庆秀,等.健康信息焦虑对健康信息规避行为的影响路径研究——基于扎根理论的探索［J］.图书情报工作,2023,67(19):111-120. GU Dongxiao,SUN Jiayue,DING Qingxiu,et al.Research on the influence path of health information anxiety on health information avoidance behavior:based on Grounded Theory ［J］.Library and Information Service,2023,67(19):111-120.
［34］陈琼,宋士杰,赵宇翔.突发公共卫生事件中信息过载对用户信息规避行为的影响：基于COVID-19信息疫情的实证研究［J］.情报资料工作,2020,41(3):76-88. CHEN Qiong,SONG Shijie,ZHAO Yuxiang.The impact of information overload on user information evasion in public health emergencies:an empirical study based on the COVID-19 information prevalence ［J］.Information and Documentation Services,2020,41(3):76-88.
［35］巩洪村,邓三鸿,曹高辉.科研知识交流情景下信息规避行为的潜在成因分析［J］.情报杂志,2022,41(6):189-199,141. GONG Hongcun,DENG Sihong,CAO Gaohui.Analysis of the potential causes of information avoidance behavior in knowledge exchange of scientific research［J］.Journal of Intelligence,2022,41(6):189-199,141.
［36］肖雪,邢畅,申宁.感知价值对高校图书馆读书会用户满意度和持续参与意愿的影响研究［J］.图书馆,2023(7):89-98. XIAO Xue,XING Chang,SHEN Ning.Research on the influence of perceived value on the satisfaction and continuous participation intention of reading club users in university library ［J］.Library,2023(7):89-98.
［37］米硕,刘润泽,张林.数字技术何以提升公众的应急安全意识与能力?——来自深圳市应急宣教平台的证据［J］.行政论坛,2023,30(5):130-139.
［38］CHEN H S,MITCHELL R K,BRIGHAM K H,et al.Perceived psychological distance,construal processes,and abstractness of entrepreneurial action［J］.Journal of Business Venturing,2018,33(3):296-314.
［39］李刚,白影波,许德惠.客户参与与新产品上市速度:基于中国制造业的实证研究［J］.科研管理,2014,35(2):94-103. LI Gang,BAI Yingbo,XU Dehui.Customer involvement and marketing speed of new products:an empirical investigation in China’s manufacturing companies ［J］.Science Research Management,2014,35(2):94-103.
［40］唐美玲,陈超亿,吴月新,等.基于PLS-SEM的老年人风险防范影响因素分析［J］.中国卫生统计,2022,39(3):413-416,421.
［41］AHSBERG E.Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations［J］.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,2000,41(3)：231-241.
［42］池毛毛,杜运周,王伟军.组态视角与定性比较分析方法：图书情报学实证研究的新道路［J］.情报学报,2021,40(4):424-434. CHI Maomao,DU Yunzhou,WANG Weijun.Configurational perspective and qualitative comparative analysis:the new way of empirical research in library and information science ［J］.Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information,2021,40(4):424-434.
［43］吴晔,黎樟浩,塔娜.作为“催化剂”的社交媒体——灾难事件中心理距离对焦虑感知的预测作用［J］.福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(3):127-136. WU Ye,LI Zhanghao,TA Na.Social media as catalysts: the predictive effect of psychological distance on anxiety perception in disasters［J］.Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2022(3):127-136.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2024-09-10
* 基金项目： 国家社会科学基金项目（21BSH001）；2020年度湖南省哲学社会科学基金基地项目（20JD037）
作者简介： 刘玮，博士，教授，主要研究方向为公共危机与社会治理。
通信作者： 刘淑琴，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为公共危机与安全管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-28