|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王彩萍,马嘉怡,苏畅,等.基于演化博弈的突发事件协同研判行为分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2025,21(3):33-41.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.03.005]
　WANG Caiping,MA Jiayi,SU Chang,et al.Analysis on collaborative judgment behavior of emergencies based on evolutionary game[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2025,21(3):33-41.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.03.005]
点击复制

基于演化博弈的突发事件协同研判行为分析*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
21
期数:
2025年3期
页码:
33-41
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2025-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on collaborative judgment behavior of emergencies based on evolutionary game
文章编号:
1673-193X(2025)-03-0033-09
作者:
王彩萍; 马嘉怡; 苏畅; 邓军
（1.西安科技大学 安全科学与工程学院，陕西 西安 710054;
2.城市安全与应急救援陕西省高等学校重点实验室，陕西 西安 710054；
3.西安科技大学 管理学院，陕西 西安 710054）
Author(s):
WANG Caiping;  MA Jiayi;  SU Chang;  DENG Jun
(1.School of Safety Science and Engineering,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054,China;
2.Key Laboratory of Urban Safety and Emergency Rescue of Shaanxi Province Higher Education Institutions,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054,China；
3.School of Management,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054,China）
关键词:
突发事件协同研判; 前景理论; 心理账户理论; 演化博弈; 仿真分析
Keywords:
collaborative judgment of emergencies;  prospect theory;  mental account theory;  evolutionary game;  simulation analysis
分类号:
X915.2
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究突发事件应急管理中多主体协同研判机制对应急决策效能的影响，结合前景理论（PT）与心理账户（MA）理论，通过效价账户和成本账户的价值判断矩阵构建演化博弈的价值感知矩阵，分析突发事件应急管理过程中一线人员、专家和政府官员三方决策主体的交互机制，并通过MATLAB仿真模型分析关键因素对突发事件协同研判行为演化的影响。研究结果表明：协同合作是应急响应效率的核心保障，当三方均采取积极策略时，系统行为演化稳定性最强，应急决策效能最好；行为成本与激励机制显著影响决策偏好，降低行为成本、借助物质激励可有效促进三方协同响应；风险调控是抑制消极行为的关键，提高消极策略的风险系数（如对瞒报、群体盲思实施问责处罚），可推动策略向积极方向演化；价值感知参照点的动态管理能够优化决策路径，通过提高成本参照点（如量化渎职损失）与降低效价期望（如合理设定绩效目标），结合应急知识宣教，激发主动应对意愿。研究结果可为构建更加有效的应急管理体系提供思路，为政策的优化和改进提供科学参考。
Abstract:
In order to investigate the influence of multi-subject collaborative judgment mechanism on the effectiveness of emergency decision-making in the emergency management of emergencies,combining the prospect theory (PT) and the mental account (MA) theory,a value perception matrix of evolutionary game was constructed through the value judgment matrix of the potency account and the cost account.The interaction mechanism of three-party decision-making subjects of the frontline personnel,experts and government officials in the emergency management process of emergencies was analyzed,and the influence of key factors on the evolution of the collaborative judgment behavior of emergencies was analyzed by using the MATLAB simulation model.The results show that the collaborative cooperation is the core guarantee of emergency response efficiency,and when all three parties adopt positive strategies,the system behavioral evolution is the most stable,and the emergency decision-making efficiency is the best.The behavioral cost and incentive mechanism significantly affect the decision-making preference,and reducing the behavioral cost or with the help of material incentives can effectively promote the three-party cooperative response.The risk control is the key to inhibit the negative behavior,and increasing the risk coefficients of negative strategies (e.g.,imposing accountability penalties for underreporting and group blindness) can promote the evolution of strategies in a positive direction.The dynamic management of value-perceived reference points can optimize the decision-making path,and by increasing the cost reference points (e.g.,quantifying the loss of malfeasance) and lowering the expectation of effectiveness (e.g.,reasonably setting the performance target),combined with the publicity and education of emergency knowledge,it can stimulate the willingness to actively respond.The research results can provide ideas for the construction of a more effective emergency management system,and provide scientific basis for the optimization and improvement of policies.

参考文献/References:

［1］吕孝礼,付帅泽,朱宪，等.突发事件协同研判行为研究：研究进展与关键科学问题［J］.中国科学基金,2020,34(6):693-702. LYU Xiaoli,FU Shuaize,ZHU Xian,et al.Joint crisis sensemaking:a review and research agenda［J］.Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China,2020,34(6):693-702.
［2］国务院事故调查组.天津港“8·12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告［EB/OL］.(2016-02-05)［2025-03-13］.https://www.gov.cn/foot/2016-02/05/content_5039788.htm.
［3］国务院灾害调查组.河南郑州“7·20”特大暴雨灾害调查报告［EB/OL］.(2022-01-21)［2025-03-13］.https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-01/21/content_5669723.htm.
［4］郭雪松.突发公共卫生事件协同应对机制研究——以新冠肺炎疫情应对为例［J］.四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(4):16-27. GUO Xuesong.Study on collaborative response to public health emergencies based on the case of COVID-19［J］.Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2020(4):16-27.
［5］薛澜,徐建华.提升应急管理风险沟通能力［J］.中国应急管理,2020(4):14-16.
［6］贾瑞雪,李卫东.基于社交网络演化的政府形象认知传播机制——以上海“12·31”外滩拥挤踩踏事件为个案［J］.公共管理学报,2018,15(2):28-42,154-155. JIA Ruixue,LI Weidong.The cognitive communication mechanisms of government image in the evolution of social network：a case study about Shanghai “12·31” bund crowded stampede［J］.Journal of Public Management,2018,15(2):28-42,154-155.
［7］杨宏山.构建高效的突发公共卫生事件预警机制［J］.人民论坛,2020(增刊1):110-112. YANG Hongshan.Building an efficient early warning mechanism for public health emergencies［J］.People’s Forum,2020(Supplement 1):110-112.
［8］靖鸣,陈阳洋.微博舆论监督信息情态研判的基本路径［J］.新闻与写作,2011(11):23-26.
［9］许伟,刘令宇,王明明.基于跨媒体分析的突发事件检测及趋势研判研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(10):2550-2556. XU Wei,LIU Lingyu,WANG Mingming.Emergency event detection and analysis for emergence management based on cross-media analytics［J］.Systems Engineering Theory & Practice,2015,35(10):2550-2556.
［10］刘冰,肖高飞,晁世育.重大突发公共卫生事件风险研判与决策模型构建研究［J］.信息资源管理学报,2021,11(5):17-26,37. LIU Bing,XIAO Gaofei,CHAO Shiyu.Research on the construction of risk assessment and decision-making model of major public health emergency［J］.Journal of Information Resources Management,2021,11(5):17-26,37.
［11］吕静.突发公共事件网络舆情搜集研判应对策略［J］.新闻爱好者,2019(6):59-61.
［12］张桂蓉,雷雨,王秉，等.数智赋能的应急情报协同体系研究［J］.现代情报,2022,42(11):150-157. ZHANG Guirong,LEI Yu,WANG Bing,et al.Research on emergency intelligence coordination system empowered by data-intelligence［J］.Journal of Modern Information,2022,42(11):150-157.
［13］刘冰,肖高飞,霍亮.重大突发疫情风险研判与决策柔性协同机制研究：基于信息聚合与知识发现［J］.图书与情报,2021(5):1-8. LIU Bing,XIAO Gaofei,HUO Liang.Research on flexible collaboration mechanism of risk assessment and decisionmaking for major epidemics:based on information aggregation and knowledge discovery［J］.Library & Information,2021(5):1-8.
［14］杜志强,戴运波.基于复制式模型的灾情协同研判系统［J］.地理信息世界,2016,23(6):1-7,14. DU Zhiqiang,DAI Yunbo.Disaster collaborative study and judgment system based on replicated model［J］.Journal of Spatio-temporal Information,2016,23(6):1-7,14.
［15］KAHNEMAN D,TVERSKY A.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk［M］.Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making:Part I，2013:99-127.
［16］THALER R H.Mental accounting and consumer choice［J］.Marketing Science,1985,4(3):199-214.
［17］胡彦,陈华友.基于三支决策和前景理论的网络舆情突发事件应急群决策模型［J］.安徽大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(6):13-19. HU Yan,CHEN Huayou.An emergency group decision-making model for network public opinion emergencies based on three-branch decision-making and prospect theory［J］.Journal of Anhui University(Natural Science Edition),2020,44(6):13-19.
［18］张公让,曹林,杨雪洁，等.考虑公众恐慌心理的突发公共卫生事件应急医疗物资调度研究［J］.物流科技,2023,46(7):32-38. ZHANG Gongrang,CAO Lin,YANG Xuejie,et al.Study on dispatching of medical supplies for public health emergencies considering public panic psychology［J］.Logistics Sci-Tech,2023,46(7):32-38.
［19］李睿,孟展豪,康心寓，等.突发灾害情境中的受灾者信息行为特征分析——以7·20郑州地铁进水事件为例［J］.情报理论与践,2023,46(3):127-133. LI Rui.Analysis of the victims information behavior characteristics in sudden disaster context:a case study on the victims of 7.20 Zhengzhou metro flooding incident［J］.Information Studies:Theory & Application,2023,46(3):127-133.
［20］袁晓芳,于鸿志,曹玉静,等.突发事件协同研判行为的演化博弈分析［J］.清华大学学报(自然科学版),2024,64(5):900-910. YUAN Xiaofang,YU Hongzhi,CAO Yujing,et al.Analysis of evolutionary game regarding emergency sensemaking behavior［J］.Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition),2024,64(5):900-910.
［21］程佳旭,祝哲,彭宗超.重大决策中专家是中立的吗?——对京津冀协同发展中专家社会稳定风险感知的分析［J］.公共行政评论,2020,13(3):134-151,198-199. CHENG Jiaxu,ZHU Zhe,PENG Zongchao.Are experts neutral in major policy decisions? Analysis of experts’ social stability risk perceptions about joint development of Beijing,Tianjin,and Hebei［J］.Public Administration Review,2020,13(3):134-151,198-199.
［22］汪文蓉.业主集体维权要警惕“群体盲思”和“群体极化”［J］.大众心理学,2010(5):44-45.
［23］戴冰.群体盲思的成因与防范［J］.兰州石化职业技术学院学报,2013,13(1):43-45. DAI Bing.Cause and prevention of mass blindness to thinking［J］.Journal of Lanzhou Petrochemical Vocational and Technical College,2013,13(1):43-45.
［24］江平宇,杨茂林,李卫东，等.集体智慧研究综述及其社群化制造应用探索［J］.中国机械工程,2020,31(15):1852-1865. JIANG Pingyu,YANG Maolin,LI Weidong,et al.CI literature review and its application exploration in social manufacturing［J］.China Mechanical Engineering,2020,31(15):1852-1865.
［25］韩帅，陈红，龙如银.基于PT-MA理论的煤矿安全群体行为演化博弈分析［J］.运筹与管理,2017,26(11):77-86. HAN Shuai,CHEN Hong,LONG Ruyin.Evolutionary game analysis of behaviors of coal mine safety groups based on PT-MA theory［J］.Operations Research and Management Science,2017,26(11):77-86.
［26］李静,王颖.Lyapunov函数的构造及应用［J］.商丘师范学院学报,2010,26(12):28-32. LI Jing,WANG Ying.The construction and application of Lyapunov function［J］.Journal of Shangqiu Normal University,2010,26(12):28-32.
［27］TVERSKY A,KAHNEMAN D.Advances in prospect theory:cumulative representation of uncertainty［J］.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992,5(4):297-323.

相似文献/References:

[1]苏秀丽,罗贤运,吕保和.基于前景理论突发水污染事件个体行为研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.028]
　SU Xiuli,LUO Xianyun,LV Baohe.Research on individual behavior in emergency event of water pollution based on prospect theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(3):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.028]
[2]陈伟珂,林宏莉.基于前景理论的地铁施工灾后重建方案决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):143.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.027]
　CHEN Weike,LIN Hongli.Research on decision-making of post-disaster reconstruction scheme for subway construction based on prospect theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(3):143.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.027]
[3]尹鑫伟,汪彤,代宝乾,等.基于PT-IE的区域性企业整体应急准备能力评估分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(8):137.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.022]
　YIN Xinwei,WANG Tong,DAI Baoqian,et al.Assessment and analysis of regional enterprises overall emergency preparedness capability based on prospect theory (PT) and information entropy (IE)[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(3):137.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.022]
[4]郑彦辉,朱昌锋,王啸.基于双层规划的应急物资调配研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(5):25.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.05.004]
　ZHENG Yanhui,ZHU Changfeng,WANG Xiao.Research on allocation of emergency material based on bilevel programming[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(3):25.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.05.004]
[5]杨耀红,曾怡,代静,等.基于前景理论的施工安全事故网络舆论监督演化博弈分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(1):132.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.021]
　YANG Yaohong,ZENG Yi,DAI Jing,et al.Evolutionary game analysis on network public opinion supervision of construction safety accidents based on prospect theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(3):132.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.021]
[6]高坤,杨春辉.机场不停航施工安全监管策略博弈分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(6):141.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.021]
　GAO Kun,YANG Chunhui.Game analysis on safety supervision strategy of airport non-stop construction[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(3):141.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.021]
[7]梁学栋,王霞.考虑多利益相关群体偏好冲突的应急响应协同决策研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(10):46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.006]
　LIANG Xuedong,WANG Xia.Research on collaborative decision-making of emergency response considering preference conflicts among multiple stakeholder groups[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(3):46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2024-06-04
* 基金项目： 国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFB4000905）；教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(22YJCZH171，23YJAZH016，24YJCZH026)；新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划项目(2022B03031-1）
作者简介： 王彩萍，博士，教授，主要研究方向为应急技术与管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-28