[1]刘晓露,严玉琼,张苏,等.IFAM与24Model的对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(9):233-240.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.09.029]
LIU Xiaolu,YAN Yuqiong,ZHANG Su,et al.Comparative study of IFAM and 24Model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(9):233-240.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.09.029]
点击复制
IFAM与24Model的对比研究
LIU Xiaolu,YAN Yuqiong,ZHANG Su,et al.Comparative study of IFAM and 24Model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(9):233-240.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.09.029]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 20
- 期数:
- 2024年9期
- 页码:
- 233-240
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2024-09-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Comparative study of IFAM and 24Model
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2024)-09-0233-08
- 关键词:
- 信息流事故致因模型（IFAM）; 事故致因2-4模型（24Model）; 事故致因; 道路交通事故; 对比研究
- Keywords:
- information-flow-based accident-cause model (IFAM); accident causation 24Model (24Model); accident causation; road traffic accident; comparative study
- 分类号:
- X915.5
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为完善和推动事故致因理论的发展，提高事故防控水平，在对信息流事故致因模型（IFAM）和事故致因2-4模型（24Model）理论基础、组成要素和分析过程对比研究的基础上，通过实例分析辨识二者之间的异同。研究结果表明：IFAM与24Model都有较强的理论基础，部分组成要素存在对应关系，但原因类别划分存在差异。IFAM以信息流和组织为研究对象，研究过程相对复杂，更适用于分析单起事故；24Model以组织为研究对象，事故原因模块通用性和逻辑性强，适用于分析单起或某类事故。在实际应用中，IFAM与24Model均可用于事故调查分析和事故分级定责，具有一定的理论和实践价值。IFAM通过信息流表征事故致因，直观描述组织外部原因因素，但对个体能力的深入研究欠缺；而24Model认为组织外部因素需要通过组织内部原因模块的欠缺体现，认为个体能力是引发事故的间接原因并进行细致分析，但对组织间相关关系的探究欠缺。研究结果可为事故预防工作提供新视角和理论支撑。
- Abstract:
- To improve and promote the development of accident causation theory and improve the accident prevention and control level,based on the comparative study of the theoretical basis,components,and analysis process of IFAM and 24Model,the similarities and differences between the two were identified through case analysis.The results show that both IFAM and 24Model have the strong theoretical basis,and there is correspondence between some of the components,but there are differences in the classification of cause categories.IFAM takes the information flow and organization as the research object,and the research process is relatively complex,so it is more suitable for analyzing single accident.24Model takes the organization as the research object,and the accident causation module has strong versatility and logic,so it is suitable for analyzing single accident or a class of accidents.In the practical application,both IFAM and 24Model can be used for accident investigation and analysis and accident classification and responsibility determination,which have certain theoretical and practical value.IFAM characterizes the accident causation through information flow,and intuitively describes the external causal factors of organization,but lacks in-depth study of individual capability.24Model argues that the external factors of organization need to be reflected through the lack of internal organizational cause module,which considers and meticulously analyzes individual capability as the indirect cause of accidents,but lacks the exploration of inter-organizational correlations.The research results can provide a new perspective and theoretical support for accident prevention.
参考文献/References:
［1］骆成,韩东,蒋灶,等.危险化学品道路运输事故复杂性机理研究综述［J］.消防科学与技术,2024,43(7):919-931.
LUO Cheng,HAN Dong,JIANG Zao,et al.A review on the complexity mechanism of road transport accidents of hazardous chemicals［J］.Fire Science and Technology,2024,43(7):919-931.
［2］宋炜,傅贵.STPA与24Model的对比分析［J］.中国安全科学学报,2023,33(6):1-10.
SONG Wei,FU Gui.Comparative analysis study of STPA and 24Model［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2023,33(6):1-10.
［3］代亚清,付净,刘虹,等.HFACS与24Model在高校实验室事故分析中的应用［J］.实验技术与管理,2019,36(10):259-264.
DAI Yaqing,FU Jing,LIU Hong,et al.Application of HFACS and 24Model in accident analysis of university laboratory［J］.Experimental Technology and Management,2019,36(10):259-264.
［4］WATERSON P,JENKINSD P,SALMONP M.“Remixing Rasmusse”:the evolution of AcciMap within systemic accident analysis［J］.Applied Ergonomics,2017,59:483-503.
［5］李冰怡.基于功能共振分析方法的我国近年特大事故致因分析［D］.北京:中国地质大学（北京）,2020.
［6］FU G,CAO J L,ZHOU L,et al.Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models［J］.Petroleum Science,2017,14:570-578.
［7］赵潮锋,周西华.安全信息缺失事故致因理论的初步研究［J］.世界科技研究与发展,2012,34(1):6-9.
ZHAO Chaofeng,ZHOU Xihua.Preliminary study on the theory of accident-causing based on safety information missing［J］.World Sci-Tech R & D,2012,34(1):6-9.
［8］李思贤,吴超,王秉.多级安全信息不对称所致事故模式研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2017,27(7):18-23.
LI Sixian,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Study on model for accident resulting from multilevel safety information asymmetry［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(7):18-23.
［9］ZHANG Q W,CHANA P C,YANG Y,et al.Influence of learning from incidents,safety information flow,and resilient safety culture on construction safety performance［J］.Journal of Management in Engineering,2023,39(3):04023007.
［10］光夏磊,吴超,王秉.安全信息思维下的PAR事故致因模型构建及其实证［J］.情报杂志,2020,39(1):179-187.
GUANG Xialei,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Constructand empirical study of PAR accident-causing model based on safety ＆ security information thinking［J］.Journal of Intelligence,2020,39(1):179-187.
［11］黄浪,吴超,马剑.安全信息流视域下的事故致因模型构建［J］.管理评论,2020,32(4):274-285.
HUANG Lang,WU Chao,MA Jian.An accident-causing model under the perspective of safety information flow［J］.Management Review,2020,32(4):274-285.
［12］黄浪,吴超,王秉.基于熵理论的重大事故复杂链式演化机理及其建模［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(5):10-15.
HUANG Lang,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Complex chain evolution mechanism and its modeling of major accident based on entropy theory［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(5):10-15.
［13］黄浪,吴超.事故致因模型体系及建模一般方法与发展趋势［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(2):10-16.
HUANG Lang,WU Chao.Study on system of accident-causing model and its general modeling methods and development trend［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(2):10-16.
［14］傅贵,陈奕燃,许素睿,等.事故致因“2-4”模型的内涵解析及第6版的研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2022,32(1):12-19.
FU Gui,CHEN Yiran,XU Surui,et al.Detailed explanations of 24Model and development of its 6th version［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2022,32(1):12-19.
［15］傅贵.安全科学学及其应用探讨［J］.安全,2019,40(2):1-10.
FU Gui.The science of safety science and its practical implications［J］.Safety and Security,2019,40(2):1-10.
［16］WU C,HUANG L.A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2019,182:73-85.
［17］黄浪,吴超,王秉.个体安全信息力的概念模型及其作用机制［J］.中国安全科学学报,2017,27(11):7-12.
HUANG Lang,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Conceptual model for individual safety information force and its action mechanism［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(11):7-12.
［18］黄浪,吴超.风险感知偏差机理概念模型构建研究［J］.自然灾害学报,2017,26(1):60-66.
HUANG Lang,WU Chao.Conceptual modelling of risk perception deviation mechanism［J］.Journal of Natural Disasters,2017,26(1):60-66.
［19］袁晨辉,傅贵,吴治蓉,等.24Model与LCM原因因素定义对比研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2024,34 (1):27-34.
YUAN Chenhui,FU Gui,WU Zhirong,et al.Comparative study on definition of cause factors between 24Model and LCM［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2024,34 (1):27-34.
［20］四川省应急管理厅.绵阳江油市“1·2”较大道路交通安全事故调查报告［EB/OL］.（2022-04-08）［2023-04-08］.https://yjgl.luohe.gov.cn/uploadfile/ueditor/file/202212/1670489165322e04.pdf.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期： 2023-11-22
作者简介： 刘晓露，博士研究生，主要研究方向为行为安全与应急管理、煤矿火灾防治。
通信作者： 张苏，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为行为安全与应急管理。
