|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王海顺,魏利军,多英全,等.化工过程系统韧性研究进展与展望*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(6):40-49.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.06.006]
　WANG Haishun,WEI Lijun,DUO Yingquan,et al.Research progress and prospects on the resilience of chemical process systems[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(6):40-49.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.06.006]
点击复制

化工过程系统韧性研究进展与展望*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
20
期数:
2024年6期
页码:
40-49
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2024-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research progress and prospects on the resilience of chemical process systems
文章编号:
1673-193X(2024)-06-0040-10
作者:
王海顺; 魏利军; 多英全; 苏明清; 杨国梁; 曾涛
（1.北京师范大学 环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室，北京 100875；
2.中国安全生产科学研究院，北京 100012；
3.中国矿业大学（北京） 应急管理与安全工程学院，北京 100083；
4.重大危险源与化工园区系统安全应急管理部重点实验室，北京 100012）
Author(s):
WANG Haishun;  WEI Lijun;  DUO Yingquan;  SU Mingqing;  YANG Guoliang;  ZENG Tao
(1.Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;
2.China Academy of Safety Science and Technology,Beijing 100012,China;
3.School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing),Beijing 100083,China;
4.Key Laboratory of Major Hazard and Chemical Industry Park System Safety,Ministry of Emergency Management,Beijing 100012,China)
关键词:
化工过程系统; 韧性概念框架; 韧性评估方法; 定量评估; 过程安全
Keywords:
chemical process system;  resilience conceptual framework;  resilience assessment approach;  quantitative assessment;  process safety
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.06.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为推动对化工过程系统韧性的研究，通过文献综述的方法，辨析系统韧性概念，解析化工过程系统韧性概念框架，从定性与定量2方面分析化工过程系统韧性评估研究的进展，探讨目前的研究挑战并展望未来研究方向。研究结果表明：化工过程系统韧性表示系统应对不利事件的预测、吸收、适应、恢复和学习能力；扰动下基于系统性能的概率方法是当前化工过程系统韧性定量评估的热点；韧性定量研究的主要挑战为扰动辨识与韧性建模等；未来研究应更多关注耦合扰动下韧性分析、综合韧性建模、动态韧性评估与韧性设计优化等方向。研究结果可为化工过程系统韧性的研究与应用提供参考。
Abstract:
To promote the research on chemical process system resilience (CPSR),through the method of literature review,the concept of system resilience was investigated,and the conceptual framework of CPSR was analyzed.The progress of CPSR assessment research was reviewed from both qualitative and quantitative aspects,then the current challenges and future directions of CPSR research were explored.The results show that CPSR represents the system’s ability to anticipate,absorb,adapt,recover,and learn in response to adverse events.The system performance-based probabilistic approaches under disturbance are the current hotspot for quantitative assessment of CPSR.The key challenges of quantitative resilience research are the disturbance identification,resilience modeling,etc.The directions of resilience analysis under coupled disturbance,comprehensive resilience modeling,dynamic resilience assessment,and design and optimization of resilience should be paid more attention in future research.The research results can provide some reference for the research and application of CPSR.

参考文献/References:

［1］WANG H S,WEI L J,WANG K,et al.Exploring human factors of major chemical accidents in China:evidence from 160 accidents during 2011—2022［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2024,89:105279.
［2］王海顺,许铭,魏利军.事故经济损失分类及评估方法研究综述［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(2):34-40.WANG Haishun,XU Ming,WEI Lijun.Review on classification and assessment methods of accident economic costs［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2023,19(2):34-40.
［3］AZADEH A,SALEHI V,ASHJARI B,et al.Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis:the case of a petrochemical plant［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2014,92(3):231-241.
［4］SHIRALI G H A,MOTAMEDZADE M,MOHAMMADFAM I,et al.Challenges in building resilience engineering (RE) and adaptive capacity:a field study in a chemical plant［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2012,90(2):83-90.
［5］ZAREI E,RAMAVANDI B,DARABI A H,et al.A framework for resilience assessment in process systems using a fuzzy hybrid MCDM model［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2021,69:104375.
［6］DINH L T T,PASMAN H,GAO X,et al.Resilience engineering of industrial processes:principles and contributing factors［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2012,25(2):233-241.
［7］JAIN P,PASMAN H J,WALDRAM S,et al.Process resilience analysis framework (PRAF):a systems approach for improved risk and safety management［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2018,53:61-73.
［8］杨国梁,魏利军,多英全,等.化工园区安全韧性内涵及量化理论模型研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(7):5-10.YANG Guoliang,WEI Lijun,DUO Yingquan,et al.Research on safety resilience connotation and quantitative theoretical model of chemical industry parks［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2023,19(7):5-10.
［9］SHIRALI G A,MOHAMMADFAM I,EBRAHIMIPOUR V.A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach:a case study in a process industry［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2013,119:88-94.
［10］袁必和,杨家祺,罗欣昱,等.基于模糊物元的化工园区安全韧性评估方法［J］.安全与环境学报,2023,23(8):2624-2629.YUAN Bihe,Yang Jiaqi,LUO Xinyu,et al.Evaluation method of safety resilience of chemical industry park based on fuzzy matter element［J］.Journal of Safety and Environment,2023,23(8):2624-2629.
［11］CHEN C,YANG M,RENIER G.A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2021,215:107909.
［12］ZENG T,CHEN GH,RENIERS G,et al.Resilience assessment of chemical industrial areas during Natech-related cascading multi-hazards［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2023,81:104967.
［13］TONG Q,GERNAY T.Resilience assessment of process industry facilities using dynamic Bayesian networks［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2023,169:547-563.
［14］SUN H,WANG H Q,YANG M,et al.A STAMP-based approach to quantitative resilience assessment of chemical process systems［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2022,222:108397.
［15］ZINETULLINA A,YANG M,KHAKZAD N,et al.Quantitative resilience assessment of chemical process systems using functional resonance analysis method and Dynamic Bayesian network［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2021,205:107232.
［16］ALEXANDER D E.Resilience and disaster risk reduction:an etymological journey［J］.Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2013,13(11):2707-2716.
［17］HOSSEINI S,BARKER K,RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ J E.A review of definitions and measures of system resilience［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2016,145:47-61.
［18］HOLLING C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems［J］.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(1):1-23.
［19］FOLKE C.Resilience:the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses［J］.Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):253-267.
［20］FRANCIS R,BEKERA B.A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems［J］.Reliability Engineering & Ssystem Safety,2014,121:90-103.
［21］MEEROW S,NEWELL J P,STULTS M.Defining urban resilience:a review［J］.Landscape and Urban Planning,2016,147:38-49.
［22］AHMADI S,SABOOHI Y,VAKILI A.Frameworks,quantitative indicators,characters,and modeling approaches to analysis of energy system resilience:a review［J］.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2021,144:110988.
［23］BRUNEAU M,CHANG S E,EGUCHI R T,et al.A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities［J］.Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733-752.
［24］ZIO E.The future of risk assessment［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2018,177:176-190.
［25］黄浪,吴超,杨冕,等.韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用［J］.中国安全科学学报,2017,27(3):1-6.HUANG Lang,WU Chao,YANG Mian,et al.Application of resilience theory in field of safety science［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(3):1-6.
［26］黄浪,吴超,王秉.系统安全韧性的塑造与评估建模［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(12):15-21.HUANG Lang,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Modeling on shaping and assessment of system safety resilience［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(12):15-21.
［27］CARPENTER S,WALKER B,ANDERIES J M,et al.From metaphor to measurement:resilience of what to what?［J］.Ecosystems (New York),2001,4(8):765-781.
［28］YANG M,SUN H,GENG S Y.On the quantitative resilience assessment of complex engineered systems［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2023,174:941-950.
［29］鞠平,王冲,辛焕海,等.电力系统的柔性、弹性与韧性研究［J］.电力自动化设备,2019,39(11):1-7.JU Ping,WANG Chong,XIN Huanhai,et al.Flexibility,resilience and toughness of power system［J］.Electric Power Automation Equipment,2019,39(11):1-7.
［30］汪辉,徐蕴雪,卢思琪,等.恢复力、弹性或韧性?——社会——生态系统及其相关研究领域中“Resilience”一词翻译之辨析［J］.国际城市规划,2017,32(4):29-39.WANG Hui,XU Yunxue,LU Siqi,et al.A comparative study of Chinese translation of resilience terminology in socio-ecological system and its related research fields［J］.Urban Planning International,2017,32(4):29-39.
［31］WANG H S,WEI L J,WANG K,et al.Current status,challenges,and future pathways of chemical industrial park safety in China［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2024,87:105233.
［32］SUN H,WANG H Q,YANG M,et al.Resilience-based approach to safety barrier performance assessment in process facilities［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2021,73:104599.
［33］JAIN P,ROGERS W J,PASMAN H J,et al.A resilience-based integrated process systems hazard analysis (RIPSHA) approach:part Ⅱ management system layer［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2018,118:115-124.
［34］JAIN P,ROGERS W J,PASMAN H J,et al.A resilience-based integrated process systems hazard analysis (RIPSHA) approach:part I plant system layer［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2018,116:92-105.
［35］RENIERS G,KHAKZAD N,COZZANI V,et al.The impact of nature on chemical industrial facilities:dealing with challenges for creating resilient chemical industrial parks［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2018,56:378-385.
［36］ZENG T,CHEN GH,RENIERS G,et al.Developing a barrier management framework for dealing with Natech domino effects and increasing chemical cluster resilience［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2022,168:778-791.
［37］AZADEH A,SALEHI V,ARVAN M,et al.Assessment of resilience engineering factors in high-risk environments by fuzzy cognitive maps:a petrochemical plant［J］.Safety Science,2014,68:99-107.
［38］JAIN P,MENTZER R,MANNAN M S.Resilience metrics for improved process-risk decision making:survey,analysis and application［J］.Safety Science,2018,108:13-28.
［39］HENRY D,RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ J E.Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2012,99:114-122.
［40］CINCOTTA S,KHAKZAD N,COZZANI V,et al.Resilience-based optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects in process plants［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2019,58:82-89.
［41］CAPUTO A C,KALEMI B,PAOLACCI F,et al.Computing resilience of process plants under Natech events:methodology and application to sesmic loading scenarios［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2020,195:106685.
［42］CAI B P,XIE M,LIU Y H,et al.Availability-based engineering resilience metric and its corresponding evaluation methodology［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2018,172:216-224.
［43］TONG Q,YANG M,ZINETULLINA A.A dynamic bayesian network-based approach to resilience assessment of engineered systems［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2020,65:104152.
［44］PAWAR B,HUFFMAN M,KHAN F,et al.Resilience assessment framework for fast response process systems［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2022,163:82-93.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2024-01-01
* 基金项目： 国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFC3001201）；北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室开放课题项目（2022-KF-11）
作者简介： 王海顺，博士研究生，主要研究方向为化工区域风险与及韧性评估。
通信作者： 魏利军，博士，教授，主要研究方向为重大工业事故预防与控制、重大危险源辨识评价与控制、定量风险评价等。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-06-25